From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: scame via "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#46926: Remove the quotes from highlighted/linked symbols when displaying docs Date: Sat, 13 Mar 2021 16:24:22 +0000 Message-ID: References: <83y2f2zrz6.fsf@gnu.org> <87eeguu0q0.fsf@gnus.org> <83czw3jy72.fsf@gnu.org> <835z1vjvm4.fsf@gnu.org> Reply-To: scame Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="32904"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: "stefan@marxist.se" , "larsi@gnus.org" , "46926@debbugs.gnu.org" <46926@debbugs.gnu.org>, "rms@gnu.org" To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Sat Mar 13 17:25:14 2021 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1lL74k-0008Rs-GN for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Sat, 13 Mar 2021 17:25:14 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:42374 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lL74j-0004K8-JQ for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Sat, 13 Mar 2021 11:25:13 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:60572) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lL74Y-0004Jy-PC for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 13 Mar 2021 11:25:02 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:48993) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lL74Y-0005ve-Hd for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 13 Mar 2021 11:25:02 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lL74Y-0001YG-D0 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 13 Mar 2021 11:25:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: scame Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sat, 13 Mar 2021 16:25:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 46926 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Original-Received: via spool by 46926-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B46926.16156526775930 (code B ref 46926); Sat, 13 Mar 2021 16:25:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 46926) by debbugs.gnu.org; 13 Mar 2021 16:24:37 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:60539 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lL748-0001Xa-RP for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 13 Mar 2021 11:24:37 -0500 Original-Received: from mail-40137.protonmail.ch ([185.70.40.137]:14084) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lL746-0001XM-2a for 46926@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 13 Mar 2021 11:24:36 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=protonmail.com; s=protonmail; t=1615652667; bh=RSig6wS8NmJe7RL90TTW1As0YGwwYoo/ruMWtdFih/A=; h=Date:To:From:Cc:Reply-To:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=uABsTpMvRDFxNjfwlrCIiYrKB76/bn+n5ojVmJfaDvpF7n0DnXhE7/rLvUr93u9cr aGkejytWDoADKpyc90GzHOFV8ZzrfudFt4WUJkXENKvtdypTEGfp5aVGApdgP2aLNV 6gnktP93/YcpOEZ8dSefSUbbMmRVyLxqrs+drtV4= In-Reply-To: <835z1vjvm4.fsf@gnu.org> X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" X-ACL-Warn: , scame Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:202269 Archived-At: > > That sounds like "my way or the highway" to me. Not very > constructive, I'm afraid. Not at all. I mean it to be constructive the emacs project should invite a visual designer of Gnome to improve the default look. The default look is pretty ugly, no offense. I know people did their best to come up with something agreeable, but development and visual design are to different areas for good reason. Good developers are usually not good visual designers. > Does anyone else here think the compromise I proposed could have some > merit? If changing the default is refused then I agree a config option is a good compromise, because then people can see its effect at everyday usage and they can judge its merits if they change the option.