From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Glenn Morris Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#16211: eww should support multiple *eww* buffers Date: Mon, 23 Dec 2013 14:01:04 -0500 Message-ID: References: <87fvpmwint.fsf@violet.siamics.net> <87eh56dkdo.fsf@flea.lifelogs.com> <87d2knaf08.fsf@flea.lifelogs.com> <87r493toph.fsf@violet.siamics.net> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1387825328 29648 80.91.229.3 (23 Dec 2013 19:02:08 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 23 Dec 2013 19:02:08 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 16211@debbugs.gnu.org To: Ivan Shmakov Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Dec 23 20:02:13 2013 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1VvAlY-0004wl-Dg for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Mon, 23 Dec 2013 20:02:12 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:35004 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VvAlX-0007Xg-QV for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Mon, 23 Dec 2013 14:02:11 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:52238) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VvAlQ-0007XI-6M for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 23 Dec 2013 14:02:08 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VvAlP-0003Uk-3Z for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 23 Dec 2013 14:02:04 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:50601) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VvAlP-0003Ug-0h for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 23 Dec 2013 14:02:03 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1VvAlO-0001s7-BG for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 23 Dec 2013 14:02:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Glenn Morris Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Mon, 23 Dec 2013 19:02:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 16211 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 16211-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B16211.13878252697120 (code B ref 16211); Mon, 23 Dec 2013 19:02:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 16211) by debbugs.gnu.org; 23 Dec 2013 19:01:09 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:36386 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1VvAkX-0001qm-5t for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 23 Dec 2013 14:01:09 -0500 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([208.118.235.10]:46147) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1VvAkV-0001qb-7E for 16211@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 23 Dec 2013 14:01:07 -0500 Original-Received: from rgm by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VvAkS-0004um-Ud; Mon, 23 Dec 2013 14:01:04 -0500 X-Spook: blackjack colonel BCCI SSL Blowpipe Echelon Downing X-Ran: =o+_z^wKxD[bVt}1f)h{rWmhGI2*:u=S)uEUN%1%{[Zve-s(=lpzP\n:0x\^]EKMJK][Gn X-Hue: yellow X-Attribution: GM In-Reply-To: <87r493toph.fsf@violet.siamics.net> (Ivan Shmakov's message of "Mon, 23 Dec 2013 18:19:22 +0000") User-Agent: Gnus (www.gnus.org), GNU Emacs (www.gnu.org/software/emacs/) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 3.x X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:82462 Archived-At: Massively off-topic: OK, so I'm finally going to bite and say that I have never seen anyone indent their own text in emails (and unindent quoted material). Where did you get this habit from? I find it a bit strange to read. (This is the _exact_ opposite of the convention used by rms, for example.)