From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Glenn Morris Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#7560: 24.0.50; 'bzr status' blocking making of GNU Emacs Date: Mon, 06 Dec 2010 12:54:07 -0500 Message-ID: References: <694A126E-27F9-4CFA-9F86-1CEDD1EBF191@Freenet.DE> <831v5w3z0g.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1291659363 23040 80.91.229.12 (6 Dec 2010 18:16:03 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 6 Dec 2010 18:16:03 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 7560@debbugs.gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Dec 06 19:15:59 2010 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1PPfbS-0003DB-FK for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Mon, 06 Dec 2010 19:15:58 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:42140 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1PPfbR-0005N8-QO for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Mon, 06 Dec 2010 13:15:57 -0500 Original-Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=55745 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1PPfay-00057q-N2 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 06 Dec 2010 13:15:29 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1PPfat-0001yd-PE for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 06 Dec 2010 13:15:28 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:45329) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1PPfat-0001yZ-Nj for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 06 Dec 2010 13:15:23 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1PPfBN-00074V-R4; Mon, 06 Dec 2010 12:49:01 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Glenn Morris Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-To: owner@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Mon, 06 Dec 2010 17:49:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 7560 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 7560-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B7560.129165770027129 (code B ref 7560); Mon, 06 Dec 2010 17:49:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 7560) by debbugs.gnu.org; 6 Dec 2010 17:48:20 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1PPfAi-00073W-At for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 06 Dec 2010 12:48:20 -0500 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([140.186.70.10]) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1PPfAg-00073L-OI for 7560@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 06 Dec 2010 12:48:19 -0500 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:37311) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1PPfGK-0000Se-1R; Mon, 06 Dec 2010 12:54:08 -0500 X-Spook: government SAPO anthrax ASIO Axis of Evil electronic X-Ran: !C[qtv0QZkOm0n)o)kp(|EI7p>!R~._12M[hTf$#!6M2*T>QaRTvI([BL]AF03_}c^lA4c X-Hue: blue X-Attribution: GM In-Reply-To: (Glenn Morris's message of "Sun\, 05 Dec 2010 15\:09\:25 -0500") User-Agent: Gnus (www.gnus.org), GNU Emacs (www.gnu.org/software/emacs/) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Resent-Date: Mon, 06 Dec 2010 12:49:01 -0500 X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:42215 Archived-At: Glenn Morris wrote: > Maybe he's using a lightweight checkout? Or a stacked branch. I checked, and those do require network access to run `bzr status'. Anyway, to me, the question is: why is the build process running bzr status at all.