From: Spencer Baugh <sbaugh@janestreet.com>
To: Juri Linkov <juri@linkov.net>
Cc: 62700@debbugs.gnu.org, Spencer Baugh <sbaugh@catern.com>
Subject: bug#62700: 29.0.60; minibuffer-{previous,next,choose}-completion behave unintuitively when point is not at end of buffer
Date: Thu, 20 Apr 2023 12:52:20 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ierfs8uzebf.fsf@janestreet.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <8635574n10.fsf@mail.linkov.net> (Juri Linkov's message of "Mon, 10 Apr 2023 21:20:27 +0300")
Juri Linkov <juri@linkov.net> writes:
>>> It just needs more testing for different categories of completion.
>>
>> Which categories do you have in mind?
>
> Actually, I can't find categories where it could fail.
> So your patch looks safe to push.
Can we go ahead and push it to Emacs master, then? I will work on the
changing-only-new-code backport for Emacs 29 as Eli requested.
>>> Maybe you could find another heuristic for insertion of completion?
>>> The code is located in the same function 'minibuffer-completion-help':
>>>
>>> (if (and (stringp start) (stringp end))
>>> (progn
>>> (delete-minibuffer-contents)
>>> (insert start choice)
>>> ;; Keep point after completion before suffix
>>> (save-excursion (insert end)))
>>>
>>> Currently it keeps point before the suffix.
>>
>> I will try. Although this is a case where completion-base-position feels
>> more suited than completion-base-affixes...
>
> Can you get the same info about positions by calculating the
> lengths of prefix/choice/suffix?
Hm I have thought about it but I can't see a simple heuristic.
It's not actually clear what behavior we want, anyway. When TAB
completes a string fully, it sends point to the end of the buffer. This
happens even if completion-cycle-threshold is non-nil, and
completion-cycle-threashold feels like a pretty similar feature to
minibuffer-{previous,next}-completion. So maybe that's correct for us to
do here too?
But a different behavior feels like it could also makes sense. For
example, if I'm completing from ffap-|-path (| is point), I'm just
cycling between ffap-bib-path, ffap-c++-path, ffap-c-path, and it feels
like as I cycle through those, point should stay right before "-path",
like ffap-bib|-path, ffap-c++|-path, ffap-c|-path. No idea how to
achieve this behavior though.
Anyway, the behavior with my earlier patch now feels fine to me, I don't
think we need any improvements to point's behavior for now.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-04-20 16:52 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 50+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <b921ea5c-71a2-4e8f-b1cf-dd26831f8104@email.android.com>
2023-04-10 18:20 ` bug#62700: 29.0.60; minibuffer-{previous,next,choose}-completion behave unintuitively when point is not at end of buffer Juri Linkov
2023-04-20 16:52 ` Spencer Baugh [this message]
2023-04-20 18:18 ` Juri Linkov
2023-04-20 18:46 ` Spencer Baugh
2023-04-20 19:00 ` Eli Zaretskii
2023-04-21 18:56 ` sbaugh
2023-04-22 10:48 ` Eli Zaretskii
2023-04-22 12:57 ` sbaugh
2023-04-22 13:15 ` Eli Zaretskii
2023-04-22 21:38 ` sbaugh
2023-04-23 6:13 ` Eli Zaretskii
2023-04-23 11:48 ` sbaugh
2023-04-24 11:22 ` Eli Zaretskii
2023-05-02 15:13 ` sbaugh
2023-05-02 17:57 ` Eli Zaretskii
2023-05-08 15:48 ` Juri Linkov
2023-05-08 16:11 ` Eli Zaretskii
2023-06-03 0:58 ` Spencer Baugh
2023-06-04 7:09 ` Eli Zaretskii
2023-06-10 10:51 ` Eli Zaretskii
2023-06-12 18:27 ` Juri Linkov
2023-06-13 2:32 ` Eli Zaretskii
2023-06-13 16:54 ` Juri Linkov
2023-06-13 16:59 ` Eli Zaretskii
2023-06-13 20:59 ` Spencer Baugh
2023-06-14 17:32 ` Juri Linkov
2023-09-03 17:37 ` Juri Linkov
2023-09-04 0:30 ` sbaugh
2023-09-04 6:51 ` Juri Linkov
2023-11-14 7:39 ` Juri Linkov
2023-11-15 17:42 ` Juri Linkov
2023-04-20 18:51 ` Eli Zaretskii
2023-04-06 17:56 Spencer Baugh
2023-04-06 18:22 ` Eli Zaretskii
2023-04-06 18:58 ` Spencer Baugh
2023-04-06 19:30 ` Eli Zaretskii
2023-04-06 20:42 ` Stefan Monnier via Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors
2023-04-06 18:55 ` Juri Linkov
2023-04-06 19:22 ` Spencer Baugh
2023-04-07 16:37 ` Juri Linkov
2023-04-07 21:02 ` sbaugh
2023-04-08 6:34 ` Eli Zaretskii
2023-04-08 10:58 ` sbaugh
2023-04-08 13:19 ` Eli Zaretskii
2023-04-08 18:36 ` Juri Linkov
2023-04-08 19:32 ` Eli Zaretskii
2023-04-09 16:40 ` Juri Linkov
2023-04-09 17:38 ` Eli Zaretskii
2023-04-08 18:30 ` Juri Linkov
[not found] ` <ierbk6lup79.fsf@janestreet.com>
2024-04-07 17:16 ` Juri Linkov
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: https://www.gnu.org/software/emacs/
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ierfs8uzebf.fsf@janestreet.com \
--to=sbaugh@janestreet.com \
--cc=62700@debbugs.gnu.org \
--cc=juri@linkov.net \
--cc=sbaugh@catern.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox
https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs.git
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).