unofficial mirror of bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org 
 help / color / mirror / code / Atom feed
From: Spencer Baugh <sbaugh@janestreet.com>
To: Juri Linkov <juri@linkov.net>
Cc: 62700@debbugs.gnu.org, Spencer Baugh <sbaugh@catern.com>
Subject: bug#62700: 29.0.60; minibuffer-{previous,next,choose}-completion behave unintuitively when point is not at end of buffer
Date: Thu, 20 Apr 2023 12:52:20 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <ierfs8uzebf.fsf@janestreet.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <8635574n10.fsf@mail.linkov.net> (Juri Linkov's message of "Mon,  10 Apr 2023 21:20:27 +0300")

Juri Linkov <juri@linkov.net> writes:
>>> It just needs more testing for different categories of completion.
>>
>> Which categories do you have in mind?
>
> Actually, I can't find categories where it could fail.
> So your patch looks safe to push.

Can we go ahead and push it to Emacs master, then?  I will work on the
changing-only-new-code backport for Emacs 29 as Eli requested.

>>> Maybe you could find another heuristic for insertion of completion? 
>>> The code is located in the same function 'minibuffer-completion-help': 
>>>
>>>   (if (and (stringp start) (stringp end)) 
>>>       (progn 
>>>         (delete-minibuffer-contents) 
>>>         (insert start choice) 
>>>         ;; Keep point after completion before suffix 
>>>         (save-excursion (insert end))) 
>>>
>>> Currently it keeps point before the suffix. 
>>
>> I will try. Although this is a case where completion-base-position feels
>> more suited than completion-base-affixes...
>
> Can you get the same info about positions by calculating the
> lengths of prefix/choice/suffix?

Hm I have thought about it but I can't see a simple heuristic.

It's not actually clear what behavior we want, anyway.  When TAB
completes a string fully, it sends point to the end of the buffer.  This
happens even if completion-cycle-threshold is non-nil, and
completion-cycle-threashold feels like a pretty similar feature to
minibuffer-{previous,next}-completion. So maybe that's correct for us to
do here too?

But a different behavior feels like it could also makes sense.  For
example, if I'm completing from ffap-|-path (| is point), I'm just
cycling between ffap-bib-path, ffap-c++-path, ffap-c-path, and it feels
like as I cycle through those, point should stay right before "-path",
like ffap-bib|-path, ffap-c++|-path, ffap-c|-path.  No idea how to
achieve this behavior though.

Anyway, the behavior with my earlier patch now feels fine to me, I don't
think we need any improvements to point's behavior for now.





  reply	other threads:[~2023-04-20 16:52 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 50+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <b921ea5c-71a2-4e8f-b1cf-dd26831f8104@email.android.com>
2023-04-10 18:20 ` bug#62700: 29.0.60; minibuffer-{previous,next,choose}-completion behave unintuitively when point is not at end of buffer Juri Linkov
2023-04-20 16:52   ` Spencer Baugh [this message]
2023-04-20 18:18     ` Juri Linkov
2023-04-20 18:46       ` Spencer Baugh
2023-04-20 19:00         ` Eli Zaretskii
2023-04-21 18:56           ` sbaugh
2023-04-22 10:48             ` Eli Zaretskii
2023-04-22 12:57               ` sbaugh
2023-04-22 13:15                 ` Eli Zaretskii
2023-04-22 21:38                   ` sbaugh
2023-04-23  6:13                     ` Eli Zaretskii
2023-04-23 11:48                       ` sbaugh
2023-04-24 11:22                         ` Eli Zaretskii
2023-05-02 15:13               ` sbaugh
2023-05-02 17:57                 ` Eli Zaretskii
2023-05-08 15:48                   ` Juri Linkov
2023-05-08 16:11                     ` Eli Zaretskii
2023-06-03  0:58                       ` Spencer Baugh
2023-06-04  7:09                         ` Eli Zaretskii
2023-06-10 10:51                       ` Eli Zaretskii
2023-06-12 18:27                         ` Juri Linkov
2023-06-13  2:32                           ` Eli Zaretskii
2023-06-13 16:54                             ` Juri Linkov
2023-06-13 16:59                               ` Eli Zaretskii
2023-06-13 20:59                                 ` Spencer Baugh
2023-06-14 17:32                                   ` Juri Linkov
2023-09-03 17:37                                   ` Juri Linkov
2023-09-04  0:30                                     ` sbaugh
2023-09-04  6:51                                       ` Juri Linkov
2023-11-14  7:39                                     ` Juri Linkov
2023-11-15 17:42                                       ` Juri Linkov
2023-04-20 18:51       ` Eli Zaretskii
2023-04-06 17:56 Spencer Baugh
2023-04-06 18:22 ` Eli Zaretskii
2023-04-06 18:58   ` Spencer Baugh
2023-04-06 19:30     ` Eli Zaretskii
2023-04-06 20:42       ` Stefan Monnier via Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors
2023-04-06 18:55 ` Juri Linkov
2023-04-06 19:22   ` Spencer Baugh
2023-04-07 16:37     ` Juri Linkov
2023-04-07 21:02       ` sbaugh
2023-04-08  6:34         ` Eli Zaretskii
2023-04-08 10:58           ` sbaugh
2023-04-08 13:19             ` Eli Zaretskii
2023-04-08 18:36           ` Juri Linkov
2023-04-08 19:32             ` Eli Zaretskii
2023-04-09 16:40               ` Juri Linkov
2023-04-09 17:38                 ` Eli Zaretskii
2023-04-08 18:30         ` Juri Linkov
     [not found]   ` <ierbk6lup79.fsf@janestreet.com>
2024-04-07 17:16     ` Juri Linkov

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

  List information: https://www.gnu.org/software/emacs/

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=ierfs8uzebf.fsf@janestreet.com \
    --to=sbaugh@janestreet.com \
    --cc=62700@debbugs.gnu.org \
    --cc=juri@linkov.net \
    --cc=sbaugh@catern.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox

	https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs.git

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).