From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Glenn Morris Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#10078: 23.3; Rmail's rmail-mine command (v) does not correctly display raw message when rmail-enable mime is true (default) Date: Thu, 24 Nov 2011 13:52:04 -0500 Message-ID: References: <878vnberrm.fsf@hp.com> <834nxzbgdf.fsf@gnu.org> <831usy9nl4.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1322160762 2153 80.91.229.12 (24 Nov 2011 18:52:42 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 24 Nov 2011 18:52:42 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 10078@debbugs.gnu.org, mark.lillibridge@hp.com To: rms@gnu.org Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Nov 24 19:52:36 2011 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([140.186.70.17]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1RTePR-00083H-Uz for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Thu, 24 Nov 2011 19:52:34 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:45017 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RTePR-0001KJ-54 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Thu, 24 Nov 2011 13:52:33 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:35865) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RTePO-0001KC-PA for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 24 Nov 2011 13:52:31 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RTePN-0002Lh-TL for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 24 Nov 2011 13:52:30 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:35870) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RTePN-0002Ld-PO for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 24 Nov 2011 13:52:29 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1RTeQr-0005SO-Ut for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 24 Nov 2011 13:54:01 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Glenn Morris Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Thu, 24 Nov 2011 18:54:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 10078 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 10078-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B10078.132216082020945 (code B ref 10078); Thu, 24 Nov 2011 18:54:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 10078) by debbugs.gnu.org; 24 Nov 2011 18:53:40 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1RTeQV-0005Rm-T7 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 24 Nov 2011 13:53:40 -0500 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([140.186.70.10]) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1RTeQU-0005Rg-PA for 10078@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 24 Nov 2011 13:53:39 -0500 Original-Received: from rgm by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RTeOy-0000aY-Mj; Thu, 24 Nov 2011 13:52:04 -0500 X-Spook: MIT-LL 2600 Magazine Armani unclassified UNSCOM Europol X-Ran: V[\>${!0M1{EmRfBT%[i@jt7'z:Z.nA3/)ZJX;0py;.<#0;;Z660u={=y+MCQsu8Se.XA* X-Hue: magenta X-Attribution: GM In-Reply-To: (Richard Stallman's message of "Thu, 24 Nov 2011 13:32:28 -0500") User-Agent: Gnus (www.gnus.org), GNU Emacs (www.gnu.org/software/emacs/) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Resent-Date: Thu, 24 Nov 2011 13:54:01 -0500 X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 2) X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:54269 Archived-At: Richard Stallman wrote: > FWIW, I have nothing against showing the MIME boundary as well. > > I thought of trying to make it show that, but I couldn't understand > the code very well, and could not do it. Me neither... > Then I saw that displaying the code exactly as it appears in the > file achieved the same goal and was easy. So I did it that way. What function are you referring to here? How do you "displaying the code exactly as it appears in the file"?