From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Glenn Morris Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#10669: 24.0.93; Emacs daemon high CPU load Date: Mon, 30 Jan 2012 19:44:56 -0500 Message-ID: References: <87ipjsg5ut.fsf@maru.md5i.com> <87ehugg2zl.fsf@maru.md5i.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1327970756 22981 80.91.229.3 (31 Jan 2012 00:45:56 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 31 Jan 2012 00:45:56 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 10669@debbugs.gnu.org To: Michael Welsh Duggan Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Jan 31 01:45:55 2012 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([140.186.70.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Rs1r8-0006Dd-RL for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Tue, 31 Jan 2012 01:45:55 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:38098 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Rs1r8-00064a-9X for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Mon, 30 Jan 2012 19:45:54 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:38861) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Rs1r5-00064P-Hp for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 30 Jan 2012 19:45:52 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Rs1r4-0005H4-CU for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 30 Jan 2012 19:45:51 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:42294) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Rs1r4-0005Gs-5u for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 30 Jan 2012 19:45:50 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1Rs1rG-0002gG-Bt for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 30 Jan 2012 19:46:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Glenn Morris Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Tue, 31 Jan 2012 00:46:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 10669 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 10669-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B10669.132797072110218 (code B ref 10669); Tue, 31 Jan 2012 00:46:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 10669) by debbugs.gnu.org; 31 Jan 2012 00:45:21 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:45909 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1Rs1qb-0002ej-2o for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 30 Jan 2012 19:45:21 -0500 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([140.186.70.10]:36222 ident=Debian-exim) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1Rs1qO-0002dx-S4 for 10669@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 30 Jan 2012 19:45:10 -0500 Original-Received: from rgm by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Rs1qC-0001Z1-AV; Mon, 30 Jan 2012 19:44:56 -0500 X-Spook: Treasury UNSCOM Ansar al-Islam CDC bluebird S Box Leitrim X-Ran: *M[@>R\-mv]stS_iSx6Kaaj(.biA$+KL+/^sW^Fzd@7.V{-"mWjm#d4|@G~pmW62iR7vmb X-Hue: black X-Attribution: GM In-Reply-To: <87ehugg2zl.fsf@maru.md5i.com> (Michael Welsh Duggan's message of "Mon, 30 Jan 2012 18:55:10 -0500") User-Agent: Gnus (www.gnus.org), GNU Emacs (www.gnu.org/software/emacs/) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 2) X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:56270 Archived-At: Michael Welsh Duggan wrote: > This bug may be related to the archived bug #5535. > Sounds similar. It's not archived or resolved BTW. The usual answer to such issues has been "use a lucid toolkit build rather than a Gtk one". But, you are already doing that, so it can't be the infamous Gtk+ bug that is responsible in this case.