From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Glenn Morris Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#15820: 24.3.50; (elisp) `File Local Variables' Date: Wed, 06 Nov 2013 13:01:01 -0500 Message-ID: References: NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1383760934 14141 80.91.229.3 (6 Nov 2013 18:02:14 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 6 Nov 2013 18:02:14 +0000 (UTC) To: 15820@debbugs.gnu.org Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Nov 06 19:02:18 2013 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Ve7Ql-0002et-Gx for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Wed, 06 Nov 2013 19:02:15 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:35308 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Ve7Qk-0005vN-Ov for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Wed, 06 Nov 2013 13:02:14 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:38047) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Ve7Qd-0005uA-Eq for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 06 Nov 2013 13:02:11 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Ve7QY-0007Vb-Vf for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 06 Nov 2013 13:02:07 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:51942) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Ve7QY-0007VX-Sh for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 06 Nov 2013 13:02:02 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1Ve7QY-00070u-Bc for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 06 Nov 2013 13:02:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Glenn Morris Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Wed, 06 Nov 2013 18:02:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 15820 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 15820-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B15820.138376086626825 (code B ref 15820); Wed, 06 Nov 2013 18:02:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 15820) by debbugs.gnu.org; 6 Nov 2013 18:01:06 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:37723 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1Ve7Pd-0006xG-5s for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 06 Nov 2013 13:01:05 -0500 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([208.118.235.10]:42741 ident=Debian-exim) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1Ve7Pb-0006wF-CL for 15820@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 06 Nov 2013 13:01:03 -0500 Original-Received: from rgm by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Ve7PZ-0002Zd-FX; Wed, 06 Nov 2013 13:01:01 -0500 X-Spook: ASIO Albright Skipjack Legion of Doom threat JPL csystems X-Ran: T`J(F-yt#{so9,9I/$XFK$sC2~r?udTz7<+n5zj!^$n]lsO%nV#P9Aj"BzFvzTZ2xD/4AK X-Hue: white X-Attribution: GM In-Reply-To: (Drew Adams's message of "Wed, 6 Nov 2013 09:09:53 -0800 (PST)") User-Agent: Gnus (www.gnus.org), GNU Emacs (www.gnu.org/software/emacs/) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 3.x X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:80086 Archived-At: Drew Adams wrote: > This part of the text is unclear: > > When defining a user option using `defcustom', you can set its > `safe-local-variable' property by adding the arguments `:safe FUNCTION' > to `defcustom' > > FUNCTION needs to be described here. Just say that FUNCTION is the same > as the function used as the value of property `safe-local-variable'. It is explained in the immediately previous paragraph. Repeating it seems unnecessarily verbose, and we all hate unnecessary verbosity, don't we?