bug#3717: marked as done (M-x man completion)

[owner@emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com (Emacs bug Tracking System)]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 833 bytes --]

Your message dated Sun, 29 Nov 2009 18:01:05 +0200
with message-id <87fx7x72qd.fsf@mail.jurta.org>
and subject line Re: bug#3717: M-x man completion
has caused the Emacs bug report #3717,
regarding M-x man completion
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com
immediately.)


-- 
3717: http://emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=3717
Emacs Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com with problems

[-- Attachment #2: Type: message/rfc822, Size: 2199 bytes --]

From: jidanni@jidanni.org
To: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org
Subject: M-x man completion
Date: Tue, 30 Jun 2009 04:48:10 +0800
Message-ID: <87bpo63gxh.fsf@jidanni.org>

severity: wishlist

I was thinking when M-x man prompts
  Manual entry (default Neurdsburg):
wouldn't it be neat if there was completion, just like for
M-! shell-command...



[-- Attachment #3: Type: message/rfc822, Size: 2370 bytes --]

From: Juri Linkov <juri@jurta.org>
To: Stefan Monnier <monnier@iro.umontreal.ca>
Cc: 3717-done@emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com, Kevin Ryde <user42@zip.com.au>
Subject: Re: bug#3717: M-x man completion
Date: Sun, 29 Nov 2009 18:01:05 +0200
Message-ID: <87fx7x72qd.fsf@mail.jurta.org>

>>> If man can say its page names then asking it would have to be the most
>>> reliable way.
>> It should be implemented to fail gracefully to not display completions
>> when man can not say its page names.
>
> AFAIK it does.

Yes, I tried to emulate `man' that doesn't support the -k switch
(using a non-existent switch), and it fails gracefully by not
providing completions, i.e. the same behavior as was in Emacs 23.1.
Anyone on platforms where `man' doesn't support the -k switch,
could use woman.el anyway.

-- 
Juri Linkov
http://www.jurta.org/emacs/