A little more info on the second patch: Between Emacs 23.0.50 and 23.0.60, 'make_terminal_frame' was split into 'make_initial_frame' and 'make_terminal_frame'. Both versions of 'make_terminal_frame' end with a potential call to 'init_frame_faces'. The issue is that the Emacs CANNOT_DUMP build on my machine calls only 'make_initial_frame' during startup, and if 'init_frame_faces' isn't called, Emacs segfaults while attempting to dereference a 'face_cache' struct member containing 0x0. This occurs during startup after entering 'recursive_edit' while evaluating 'display-supports-face-attributes-p'. Maybe on DUMPED platforms 'init_frame_faces' somehow gets called earlier? HTH, Chris Hall ---------- Forwarded message ---------- Date: 2008-03-01 23:07:00 -1000 From: Chris Hall Subject: Patches for CANNOT_DUMP on 23.0.60 Aloha :) I currently use Emacs on Debian Sarge (sorry, RMS! ;) with a custom 2.6 kernel. I have recently also started using the GNUstep port, Emacs.app, on the current stable GNUstep. As of this writing, that would be: gnustep-base-1.14.2, gnustep-back-0.12.1 (libart), gnustep-gui-0.12.1, gnustep-make-2.0.4. Attached please find two patches that resolve: * While building Emacs 23.0.60, I would consistently get the following: batch-byte-compile quail/CCDOSPY.el make[1]: *** [quail/CCDOSPY.elc] Segmentation fault Based on information I received from YAMAMOTO Mitsuharu, the code in the attached patch 'gnustep-callproc.c.diff' seems to resolve that issue. * During startup, Emacs would consistently segfault while attempting to dereference a face_cache struct member containing address 0x0. This appears to be due to a problem where certain lisp functions get called in one order on DUMPED machines, and a different order on CANNOT_DUMP machines. (And again, YAMAMOTO Mitsuharu was very helpful in resolving this.) The attached patch 'gnustep-frame.c.diff' seems to resolve that issue on my machine. FYI, I also needed to increase SYSTEM_PURESIZE_EXTRA in order to avoid the associated warning message on startup. I used 200000 after first trying 100000, which wasn't enough. You may, of course, Free-ly use (or not!) the attached files. Mahalo for your time, Chris Hall