From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: don@donarmstrong.com (Emacs bug Tracking System) Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#1259: marked as done (quit-window: does it quit the wrong buffer?) Date: Thu, 30 Oct 2008 08:50:03 -0700 Message-ID: References: <4909D5D9.60300@gmx.at> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="----------=_1225381803-25410-0" X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1225381850 28507 80.91.229.12 (30 Oct 2008 15:50:50 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 30 Oct 2008 15:50:50 +0000 (UTC) To: martin rudalics Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Oct 30 16:51:52 2008 connect(): Connection refused Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1KvZoL-0002kl-Ao for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Thu, 30 Oct 2008 16:51:49 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:33525 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1KvZnE-0007z6-Sz for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Thu, 30 Oct 2008 11:50:40 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1KvZmo-0007m0-LG for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 30 Oct 2008 11:50:15 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1KvZml-0007jb-5E for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 30 Oct 2008 11:50:13 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=44476 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1KvZmk-0007jU-T0 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 30 Oct 2008 11:50:10 -0400 Original-Received: from rzlab.ucr.edu ([138.23.92.77]:47740) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1KvZmk-0005vQ-3j for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 30 Oct 2008 11:50:10 -0400 Original-Received: from rzlab.ucr.edu (rzlab.ucr.edu [127.0.0.1]) by rzlab.ucr.edu (8.13.8/8.13.8/Debian-3) with ESMTP id m9UFo3a7025520; Thu, 30 Oct 2008 08:50:03 -0700 Original-Received: (from debbugs@localhost) by rzlab.ucr.edu (8.13.8/8.13.8/Submit) id m9UFo3wN025497; Thu, 30 Oct 2008 08:50:03 -0700 X-Mailer: MIME-tools 5.420 (Entity 5.420) X-Loop: don@donarmstrong.com X-Emacs-PR-Message: closed 1259 X-Emacs-PR-Package: emacs X-detected-operating-system: by monty-python.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:22040 Archived-At: This is a multi-part message in MIME format... ------------=_1225381803-25410-0 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Your message dated Thu, 30 Oct 2008 16:42:17 +0100 with message-id <4909D5D9.60300@gmx.at> and subject line Re: bug#1259: quit-window: does it quit the wrong buffer? has caused the Emacs bug report #1259, regarding quit-window: does it quit the wrong buffer? to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact don@donarmstrong.com immediately.) --=20 1259: http://emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=3D1259 Emacs Bug Tracking System Contact don@donarmstrong.com with problems ------------=_1225381803-25410-0 Content-Type: message/rfc822 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.3-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (2007-08-08) on rzlab.ucr.edu X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.4 required=4.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,FOURLA, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED autolearn=ham version=3.2.3-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Received: (at submit) by emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com; 27 Oct 2008 01:20:06 +0000 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org (fencepost.gnu.org [140.186.70.10]) by rzlab.ucr.edu (8.13.8/8.13.8/Debian-3) with ESMTP id m9R1K2XS022866 for ; Sun, 26 Oct 2008 18:20:03 -0700 Received: from mail.gnu.org ([199.232.76.166]:60905 helo=mx10.gnu.org) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.67) (envelope-from ) id 1KuGjK-0002T4-N5 for emacs-pretest-bug@gnu.org; Sun, 26 Oct 2008 21:17:14 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by monty-python.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1KuGm0-0008OV-6G for emacs-pretest-bug@gnu.org; Sun, 26 Oct 2008 21:20:00 -0400 Received: from ug-out-1314.google.com ([66.249.92.171]:20165) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1KuGlz-0008ND-NO for emacs-pretest-bug@gnu.org; Sun, 26 Oct 2008 21:20:00 -0400 Received: by ug-out-1314.google.com with SMTP id 36so152286uga.17 for ; Sun, 26 Oct 2008 18:19:52 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:from:to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:subject:date :x-mailer; bh=NBT7mAW/hcseEVbSIS7QyKkd63E5mcxaYSOcMI/DmYk=; b=Z56IgpXKQY/WYCCeP+BprvkbcsrgyPUw9Ag6AfYFFqy4wTxIwA/JwpzQ7EKYgJHmGp Pau2YgrR+nIi4McYKWjNUsFT9Ph8qEEE+ailGOjPO5zbrkRIBAoqhbRmp0k2klm4AxsU uiWjqYfr7x6Oqbst6JAytksJ23DrOhDjeHO58= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:from:to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding :mime-version:subject:date:x-mailer; b=ez+c6/rJpLsqjrPQ2FEjxu3clLSjzloRuSgmoOzGV+QiH2EzUrZub1W5gpAKCO2SrC dfihoSgNPCW9usJe9vwiqPPbDsJcSOySK3IDBvE0P5FSvbPSX6gnT6zGnUdaNp6NzfHG 7a8bW2efYTf1m+lEXQNcfVv0B1PS1qYJPgxsc= Received: by 10.66.218.15 with SMTP id q15mr1716283ugg.77.1225070392707; Sun, 26 Oct 2008 18:19:52 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ?10.0.1.2? (pool-151-201-18-130.pitt.east.verizon.net [151.201.18.130]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id w28sm1358599uge.5.2008.10.26.18.19.50 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Sun, 26 Oct 2008 18:19:51 -0700 (PDT) Message-Id: From: David Reitter To: emacs-pretest-bug@gnu.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed; delsp=yes Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v929.2) Subject: quit-window: does it quit the wrong buffer? Date: Sun, 26 Oct 2008 21:19:48 -0400 X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.929.2) X-detected-operating-system: by monty-python.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 2) I'm wondering if there is a discrepancy between the doc string of quit- window and its implementation: The function is supposed to quit the current buffer, but what it seems to do is to quit the buffer in the selected window. (defun quit-window (&optional kill window) "Quit the current buffer. Bury it, and maybe delete the selected frame. \(The frame is deleted if it contains a dedicated window for the buffer.) With a prefix argument, kill the buffer instead. Noninteractively, if KILL is non-nil, then kill the current buffer, otherwise bury it. If WINDOW is non-nil, it specifies a window; we delete that window, and the buffer that is killed or buried is the one in that window." (interactive "P") (let ((buffer (window-buffer window)) (frame (window-frame (or window (selected-window)))) ------------=_1225381803-25410-0 Content-Type: message/rfc822 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.3-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (2007-08-08) on rzlab.ucr.edu X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.7 required=4.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=ham version=3.2.3-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Received: (at 1259-done) by emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com; 30 Oct 2008 15:43:37 +0000 Received: from mail.gmx.net (mail.gmx.net [213.165.64.20]) by rzlab.ucr.edu (8.13.8/8.13.8/Debian-3) with SMTP id m9UFhW2U024162 for <1259-done@emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com>; Thu, 30 Oct 2008 08:43:34 -0700 Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 30 Oct 2008 15:43:26 -0000 Received: from 62-47-39-58.adsl.highway.telekom.at (EHLO [62.47.39.58]) [62.47.39.58] by mail.gmx.net (mp004) with SMTP; 30 Oct 2008 16:43:26 +0100 X-Authenticated: #14592706 X-Provags-ID: V01U2FsdGVkX1/cuBoaFZPcENE/E0Dw0T1dx1iSuLde7f20I1Qn4t 0Spy5WRCqwrC3S Message-ID: <4909D5D9.60300@gmx.at> Date: Thu, 30 Oct 2008 16:42:17 +0100 From: martin rudalics User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.16 (Windows/20080708) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: 1259-done@emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com CC: David Reitter Subject: Re: bug#1259: quit-window: does it quit the wrong buffer? References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0 X-FuHaFi: 0.71 Fixed as 2008-10-30 Martin Rudalics * window.el (quit-window): Simplify code. Say in doc-string that it operates on the selected window's buffer. (Bug#1259) Thanks, martin ------------=_1225381803-25410-0--