From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Glenn Morris Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#6953: 24.0.50; serious security bug in create backup files Date: Tue, 21 Sep 2010 21:34:53 -0400 Message-ID: References: <19583.19642.954872.847808@bugle.cse.ucsc.edu> <19583.53728.357608.629758@bugle.cse.ucsc.edu> <4mzkvs44no.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> <83zkvl50ly.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1285119670 1012 80.91.229.12 (22 Sep 2010 01:41:10 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 22 Sep 2010 01:41:10 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 6953@debbugs.gnu.org, markd@soe.ucsc.edu To: monnier@iro.umontreal.ca Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Sep 22 03:41:08 2010 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OyEKW-0002PC-He for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Wed, 22 Sep 2010 03:41:04 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:58159 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1OyEKW-0000xO-1G for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Tue, 21 Sep 2010 21:41:04 -0400 Original-Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=52050 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1OyEKQ-0000w0-Ht for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 21 Sep 2010 21:40:59 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OyEKP-0007Or-HY for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 21 Sep 2010 21:40:58 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:57497) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OyEKP-0007On-Cx for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 21 Sep 2010 21:40:57 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OyECj-0004M4-R8; Tue, 21 Sep 2010 21:33:01 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Glenn Morris Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-To: owner@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Wed, 22 Sep 2010 01:33:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 6953 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 6953-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B6953.128511914216731 (code B ref 6953); Wed, 22 Sep 2010 01:33:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 6953) by debbugs.gnu.org; 22 Sep 2010 01:32:22 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OyEC6-0004Lo-6X for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 21 Sep 2010 21:32:22 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([140.186.70.10]) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OyEC4-0004Lj-J8 for 6953@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 21 Sep 2010 21:32:21 -0400 Original-Received: from rgm by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OyEEX-0001UX-I7; Tue, 21 Sep 2010 21:34:53 -0400 X-Spook: constitution Blowfish counter intelligence kibo Qaddafi X-Ran: }jx/*/&OQ5b;IOB$b^L%wv-<(0RGQv!5h@akWX*BFz{t9Bg|Lfag6}5PpUm<8A6Q\ojXw? X-Hue: blue X-Attribution: GM In-Reply-To: <83zkvl50ly.fsf@gnu.org> (Eli Zaretskii's message of "Mon\, 13 Sep 2010 13\:44\:41 +0200") User-Agent: Gnus (www.gnus.org), GNU Emacs (www.gnu.org/software/emacs/) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Resent-Date: Tue, 21 Sep 2010 21:33:01 -0400 X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:40348 Archived-At: So, is there a consensus for what approach to take with this?