From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Kevin Rodgers Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#2151: 23.0.90; Building the 23.0.90 pretest recompiles Lisp files Date: Sun, 22 Feb 2009 11:19:07 -0700 Message-ID: References: Reply-To: Kevin Rodgers , 2151@emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1235328232 30875 80.91.229.12 (22 Feb 2009 18:43:52 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 22 Feb 2009 18:43:52 +0000 (UTC) To: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun Feb 22 19:45:08 2009 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1LbJK7-00077b-Ap for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sun, 22 Feb 2009 19:45:07 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:35473 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1LbJIm-0005gN-TI for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sun, 22 Feb 2009 13:43:44 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1LbJIi-0005fk-No for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 22 Feb 2009 13:43:40 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1LbJIi-0005fF-2w for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 22 Feb 2009 13:43:40 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=41430 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1LbJIh-0005f7-UH for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 22 Feb 2009 13:43:39 -0500 Original-Received: from rzlab.ucr.edu ([138.23.92.77]:50118) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1LbJIh-0000MH-6S for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 22 Feb 2009 13:43:39 -0500 Original-Received: from rzlab.ucr.edu (rzlab.ucr.edu [127.0.0.1]) by rzlab.ucr.edu (8.13.8/8.13.8/Debian-3) with ESMTP id n1MIhamn028247; Sun, 22 Feb 2009 10:43:37 -0800 Original-Received: (from debbugs@localhost) by rzlab.ucr.edu (8.13.8/8.13.8/Submit) id n1MIP5Rk023553; Sun, 22 Feb 2009 10:25:05 -0800 X-Loop: owner@emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com Resent-From: Kevin Rodgers Original-Sender: news Resent-To: bug-submit-list@donarmstrong.com Resent-CC: Emacs Bugs Resent-Date: Sun, 22 Feb 2009 18:25:04 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: owner@emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com X-Emacs-PR-Message: followup 2151 X-Emacs-PR-Package: emacs X-Emacs-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by submit@emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com id=B.123532675722156 (code B ref -1); Sun, 22 Feb 2009 18:25:04 +0000 Original-Received: (at submit) by emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com; 22 Feb 2009 18:19:17 +0000 X-Spam-Bayes: score:0.5 Bayes not run. spammytokens:Tokens not available. hammytokens:Tokens not available. Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [199.232.76.165]) by rzlab.ucr.edu (8.13.8/8.13.8/Debian-3) with ESMTP id n1MIJBuw022150 for ; Sun, 22 Feb 2009 10:19:14 -0800 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1LbIv1-0001cj-2U for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 22 Feb 2009 13:19:11 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1LbIuy-0001cX-M4 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 22 Feb 2009 13:19:09 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=47811 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1LbIuy-0001cU-FE for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 22 Feb 2009 13:19:08 -0500 Original-Received: from main.gmane.org ([80.91.229.2]:55675 helo=ciao.gmane.org) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1LbIuy-0004av-4d for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 22 Feb 2009 13:19:08 -0500 Original-Received: from list by ciao.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1LbIus-000505-1n for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 22 Feb 2009 18:19:02 +0000 Original-Received: from c-67-161-145-183.hsd1.co.comcast.net ([67.161.145.183]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sun, 22 Feb 2009 18:19:02 +0000 Original-Received: from kevin.d.rodgers by c-67-161-145-183.hsd1.co.comcast.net with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sun, 22 Feb 2009 18:19:02 +0000 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ Original-Lines: 14 Original-X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: c-67-161-145-183.hsd1.co.comcast.net User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.19 (Macintosh/20081209) In-Reply-To: X-detected-operating-system: by monty-python.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6, seldom 2.4 (older, 4) X-detected-operating-system: by monty-python.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) Resent-Date: Sun, 22 Feb 2009 13:43:40 -0500 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:25597 Archived-At: Stefan Monnier wrote: > My guess is that many more people build from CVS than from the release > tarball. Most users of the release will use a precompiled package. > So I care much more about building from CVS than building from > a tarball. Also I care more about the build being reliable and > maintainable, than about it being optimal in all circumstances, so if > building from the tarball does a bit of extra work, I don't really mind > as long as it makes maintenance easier. Is there a reliable way to count CVS users vs. tarball users? -- Kevin Rodgers Denver, Colorado, USA