From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Glenn Morris Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#19889: tex-verbatim face: don't specify :family? Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2015 15:39:45 -0500 Message-ID: NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1424205623 5761 80.91.229.3 (17 Feb 2015 20:40:23 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2015 20:40:23 +0000 (UTC) To: 19889@debbugs.gnu.org Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Feb 17 21:40:14 2015 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1YNowG-0006Cl-A8 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Tue, 17 Feb 2015 21:40:12 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:47260 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YNowF-00029a-G1 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Tue, 17 Feb 2015 15:40:11 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:50536) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YNow7-00027v-Qn for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 17 Feb 2015 15:40:04 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YNow6-0008RY-TP for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 17 Feb 2015 15:40:03 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:55411) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YNow6-0008RO-Qs for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 17 Feb 2015 15:40:02 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1YNow6-0007kN-IU for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 17 Feb 2015 15:40:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Glenn Morris Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2015 20:40:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: report 19889 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: X-Debbugs-Original-To: submit@debbugs.gnu.org Original-Received: via spool by submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B.142420559029755 (code B ref -1); Tue, 17 Feb 2015 20:40:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 17 Feb 2015 20:39:50 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:46651 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1YNovt-0007jr-FE for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 17 Feb 2015 15:39:49 -0500 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([208.118.235.10]:45057 ident=Debian-exim) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1YNovq-0007ji-O4 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 17 Feb 2015 15:39:47 -0500 Original-Received: from rgm by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YNovp-0005Pc-S4; Tue, 17 Feb 2015 15:39:45 -0500 X-Spook: 22nd SAS satellite imagery Gazprom CipherTAC-2000 X-Ran: zQ8'gR0~|(~RY`?kM^xkI;1Fb%_5bdX=miaHud~5XDoQNTg-m=M[JJK,w=);&^aCa!FS{9 X-Hue: black X-Attribution: GM User-Agent: Gnus (www.gnus.org), GNU Emacs (www.gnu.org/software/emacs/) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 3.x X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:99508 Archived-At: Package: emacs Version: 24.4 Severity: minor The tex-verbatim face is defined as '((t :family "courier")) Is this a good idea? AFAICS, it is the only face definition in Emacs that specifies a :family. It seems to cause problems on some systems, see: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=684797 For me on RHEL7, that faces looks poor (blocky/pixellated) compared to the other faces Emacs uses.