From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Glenn Morris Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#18779: 24.4; Compilation error on Mac OS X Yosemite Date: Thu, 05 Feb 2015 11:59:34 -0500 Message-ID: References: <54D388FF.5020802@swipnet.se> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1423155621 32196 80.91.229.3 (5 Feb 2015 17:00:21 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 5 Feb 2015 17:00:21 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 18779@debbugs.gnu.org, Constantine Vetoshev To: "Jan D." Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Feb 05 18:00:17 2015 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1YJPmp-0002WR-Nz for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Thu, 05 Feb 2015 18:00:15 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:43188 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YJPmo-0002ON-4J for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Thu, 05 Feb 2015 12:00:14 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:41186) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YJPmh-0002HF-4C for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 05 Feb 2015 12:00:07 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YJPmd-0007dE-9J for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 05 Feb 2015 12:00:07 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:43696) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YJPmd-0007ce-76 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 05 Feb 2015 12:00:03 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1YJPmc-0003KJ-9A for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 05 Feb 2015 12:00:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Glenn Morris Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Thu, 05 Feb 2015 17:00:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 18779 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 18779-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B18779.142315557912729 (code B ref 18779); Thu, 05 Feb 2015 17:00:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 18779) by debbugs.gnu.org; 5 Feb 2015 16:59:39 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:34936 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1YJPmF-0003JD-Gv for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 05 Feb 2015 11:59:39 -0500 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([208.118.235.10]:50647 ident=Debian-exim) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1YJPmC-0003J4-Jj for 18779@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 05 Feb 2015 11:59:37 -0500 Original-Received: from rgm by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YJPmA-0005mj-AM; Thu, 05 Feb 2015 11:59:34 -0500 X-Spook: ASPIC Aladdin AVIP strategic electronic surveillance X-Ran: tt[[+rysx]VL@%y)|;E=6Jm4.30>M6g9<>J2kozAtm3TO)*{u(t!t;sz0nv$/\N]rd~IUe X-Hue: green X-Attribution: GM In-Reply-To: <54D388FF.5020802@swipnet.se> (Jan D.'s message of "Thu, 05 Feb 2015 16:15:11 +0100") User-Agent: Gnus (www.gnus.org), GNU Emacs (www.gnu.org/software/emacs/) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 3.x X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:99066 Archived-At: "Jan D." wrote: > If you don't have anything in /usr/include you havent installed the > command line tools, which Emacs kind of assumes you have, i.e. Is it possible/worth it to add some basic sanity-checking to configure.ac that tests this?