From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: scame via "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#46926: Remove the quotes from highlighted/linked symbols when displaying docs Date: Wed, 17 Mar 2021 06:00:33 +0000 Message-ID: References: <6214567e-7e89-010d-5d0a-de0b69392625@yandex.ru> <831rcgfgpd.fsf@gnu.org> <401c0b82-a6b9-eb74-8de8-84fc956f8813@yandex.ru> <83pmzzepn7.fsf@gnu.org> <83o8fje0nd.fsf@gnu.org> <874khawv4y.fsf@gnus.org> Reply-To: scame Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="21574"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: "46926@debbugs.gnu.org" <46926@debbugs.gnu.org>, Eli Zaretskii , Stefan Kangas , "rms@gnu.org" , "dgutov@yandex.ru" To: Lars Ingebrigtsen Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Wed Mar 17 07:01:10 2021 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1lMPF0-0005WR-4U for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Wed, 17 Mar 2021 07:01:10 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:42210 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lMPEy-0005dd-S6 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Wed, 17 Mar 2021 02:01:08 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:59392) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lMPEs-0005dW-Fx for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 17 Mar 2021 02:01:02 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:58379) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lMPEs-0001T1-8o for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 17 Mar 2021 02:01:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lMPEs-00086V-4y for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 17 Mar 2021 02:01:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: scame Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Wed, 17 Mar 2021 06:01:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 46926 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Original-Received: via spool by 46926-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B46926.161596085131126 (code B ref 46926); Wed, 17 Mar 2021 06:01:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 46926) by debbugs.gnu.org; 17 Mar 2021 06:00:51 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:41692 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lMPEh-00085y-Fq for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 17 Mar 2021 02:00:51 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-40141.protonmail.ch ([185.70.40.141]:44736) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lMPEb-00085h-Lc for 46926@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 17 Mar 2021 02:00:50 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=protonmail.com; s=protonmail; t=1615960839; bh=NFF/ejgw1J16osHsm04wzZ1IecG3HZ1ttALdwnBMTS4=; h=Date:To:From:Cc:Reply-To:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=Ko2h8MfyvU2/UHm2/XKPD35dvIX7L/Xd6o9d/oRV9477NPVKord1bmiy739kNKlxW oxtcu7D69PLLxtR/M3Ss3YDodYjRPe2QUaRf0YWJRdx1lzImGRFG9xGKfIGNGYEc8y EPzx0qglnU+v/CDrDxrldIYbeIh7JPEBiOs+zf4g= In-Reply-To: <874khawv4y.fsf@gnus.org> X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" X-ACL-Warn: , scame Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:202510 Archived-At: > > Are we disputing anything about`M-o M-o'? Questions were raised about wha= t the use case of`font-lock-fontify-block' was (because it's a > command that some people have never used, and some people seem to find > very useful). Which is one of the things this process seems to be handy > at clarifying. > Could you all who discuss the M-o problem take this discussion off from bug46926's thread? For those of us who follow this specific bug, details of the M-o discussion is unrelated noise. Thanks.