From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Glenn Morris Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#8674: Date: Tue, 17 May 2011 12:56:07 -0400 Message-ID: References: <825788.16783.qm@web32003.mail.mud.yahoo.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1305652188 2463 80.91.229.12 (17 May 2011 17:09:48 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 17 May 2011 17:09:48 +0000 (UTC) To: 8674-done@debbugs.gnu.org Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue May 17 19:09:44 2011 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([140.186.70.17]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1QMNm9-0007Q7-Dx for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Tue, 17 May 2011 19:09:41 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:46478 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QMNm8-0001W4-Nf for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Tue, 17 May 2011 13:09:40 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:43110) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QMNZx-00043D-3i for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 17 May 2011 12:57:05 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QMNZv-0001ej-BJ for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 17 May 2011 12:57:05 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:53809) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QMNZv-0001dp-89 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 17 May 2011 12:57:03 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1QMNZu-0004ki-DE; Tue, 17 May 2011 12:57:02 -0400 Resent-From: Glenn Morris Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-To: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org, bugs@gnus.org Resent-Date: Tue, 17 May 2011 16:57:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: cc-closed 8674 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs,gnus X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Mail-Followup-To: 8674@debbugs.gnu.org, rgm@gnu.org Original-Received: via spool by 8674-done@debbugs.gnu.org id=D8674.130565137718216 (code D ref 8674); Tue, 17 May 2011 16:57:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 8674-done) by debbugs.gnu.org; 17 May 2011 16:56:17 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1QMNZA-0004jk-MH for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 17 May 2011 12:56:17 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([140.186.70.10]) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1QMNZ8-0004jZ-I0 for 8674-done@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 17 May 2011 12:56:14 -0400 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:52225) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QMNZ2-0000F1-73; Tue, 17 May 2011 12:56:08 -0400 X-Spook: Dateline SCUD missile kilderkin Medco csystems Attorney X-Ran: Pys`AF/_uP',A_F#W>"0~A^ot%jU"Ps>Pv[r]h4py&&ppNs1Hu/^{)!:m_zxqQ5,iaidgv X-Hue: white X-Attribution: GM In-Reply-To: <825788.16783.qm@web32003.mail.mud.yahoo.com> (Benjamin L. Russell's message of "Mon, 16 May 2011 19:22:37 -0700 (PDT)") User-Agent: Gnus (www.gnus.org), GNU Emacs (www.gnu.org/software/emacs/) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Resent-Date: Tue, 17 May 2011 12:57:02 -0400 X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:46517 Archived-At: Each bug report should be focused on a specific issue that is thought to be a bug, not a grab-bag of configuration questions. The right place to ask your remaining question is a Gnus user list, which I see you have done. If you don't get a satisfactory answer in a few days, and you think there is an actual bug, then please open a new bug report that summarizes the issue. In the meantime I am closing this report, since the initial issue you reported is resolved.