From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.ciao.gmane.io!not-for-mail From: Drew Adams Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#30539: 26.0; `char-displayable-p' is much slower in Emacs 25 and 26 Date: Sat, 27 Jun 2020 21:34:02 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: References: <8c79c39f-7abb-4591-a676-17fb46af5a8f@default> <923b8123-937d-4ffb-9988-5359fdcbb6bc@default> <87woz44grg.fsf@gmail.com> <87tvu84c05.fsf@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="ciao.gmane.io:159.69.161.202"; logging-data="86558"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: 30539@debbugs.gnu.org To: Noam Postavsky Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Sat Jun 27 23:35:10 2020 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1jpITd-000MPN-T4 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Sat, 27 Jun 2020 23:35:09 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:56554 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jpITc-0000E6-VT for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Sat, 27 Jun 2020 17:35:08 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:52280) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jpITX-0000Dx-00 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 27 Jun 2020 17:35:03 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:33198) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jpITW-0001z1-N2 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 27 Jun 2020 17:35:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1jpITW-0008Bo-Iv for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 27 Jun 2020 17:35:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Drew Adams Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sat, 27 Jun 2020 21:35:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 30539 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Original-Received: via spool by 30539-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B30539.159329365531415 (code B ref 30539); Sat, 27 Jun 2020 21:35:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 30539) by debbugs.gnu.org; 27 Jun 2020 21:34:15 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:44744 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1jpISl-0008Ac-3d for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 27 Jun 2020 17:34:15 -0400 Original-Received: from userp2130.oracle.com ([156.151.31.86]:57404) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1jpISh-0008AL-N6 for 30539@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 27 Jun 2020 17:34:13 -0400 Original-Received: from pps.filterd (userp2130.oracle.com [127.0.0.1]) by userp2130.oracle.com (8.16.0.42/8.16.0.42) with SMTP id 05RLHJFX052400; Sat, 27 Jun 2020 21:34:06 GMT DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=oracle.com; h=mime-version : message-id : date : from : sender : to : cc : subject : references : in-reply-to : content-type : content-transfer-encoding; s=corp-2020-01-29; bh=ihbtQ9J6pi2rKXtqCPvNtWmeW17FdDFo7BMv3GZrUo4=; b=z5vhGpT4BJQaPM5dn7aaocrWEzr3QpAeqvyPSY+rI0D0ea6d1ljWDkfKXLriIvBHfLa0 uhpAABaL/Lb9o+rZPaF7K+V7nQD3H60pdfXerKN0OLa7S7ts58Hv55VtRIxQSP40naYh wbOi01Kocr6FoTDX5v8/8K+WY8QAZ0lE76NQPQwfmNiPsNOJmt51n0cq4DgBUdSZhnZi OA11c0CB6G5BYHbt29W1TI7IHaf3MtrZAWwQ/5FSqBUhcjOOH8zNokcw1171tbOYhg9i 0mDQdqx85Rb162wfEO2dZu4VH/3gDp3YAzr9hHnOrmaAg7DMfmMkf1j78zjjuTRe3xkf 5Q== Original-Received: from userp3030.oracle.com (userp3030.oracle.com [156.151.31.80]) by userp2130.oracle.com with ESMTP id 31wwhr9p3r-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=FAIL); Sat, 27 Jun 2020 21:34:05 +0000 Original-Received: from pps.filterd (userp3030.oracle.com [127.0.0.1]) by userp3030.oracle.com (8.16.0.42/8.16.0.42) with SMTP id 05RLHbXG168373; Sat, 27 Jun 2020 21:34:05 GMT Original-Received: from userv0122.oracle.com (userv0122.oracle.com [156.151.31.75]) by userp3030.oracle.com with ESMTP id 31wu7ses90-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=OK); Sat, 27 Jun 2020 21:34:05 +0000 Original-Received: from abhmp0005.oracle.com (abhmp0005.oracle.com [141.146.116.11]) by userv0122.oracle.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id 05RLY3Zi019247; Sat, 27 Jun 2020 21:34:05 GMT In-Reply-To: <87tvu84c05.fsf@gmail.com> X-Priority: 3 X-Mailer: Oracle Beehive Extensions for Outlook 2.0.1.9.1 (1003210) [OL 16.0.5017.0 (x86)] X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=nai engine=6000 definitions=9665 signatures=668680 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=notspam policy=default score=0 mlxlogscore=999 bulkscore=0 spamscore=0 malwarescore=0 adultscore=0 mlxscore=0 suspectscore=0 phishscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.12.0-2004280000 definitions=main-2006270156 X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=nai engine=6000 definitions=9665 signatures=668680 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=notspam policy=default score=0 mlxlogscore=999 malwarescore=0 phishscore=0 priorityscore=1501 clxscore=1011 cotscore=-2147483648 mlxscore=0 adultscore=0 lowpriorityscore=0 impostorscore=0 bulkscore=0 spamscore=0 suspectscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.12.0-2004280000 definitions=main-2006270156 X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:182442 Archived-At: > From: Noam Postavsky Sent: Thursday, February 22, 2018 7:32 PM > > > Is this a bug that is likely to get fixed? >=20 > Unfortunately, no, I don't think so (at least not soon). My > understanding is that this inhibit-compacting-font-caches variable is > due to several mysterious font bugs with different users needing > different settings to work around them, and there isn't anyone who has a > good idea of how to sort it out. Just checking, to see if this situation might have changed in the last 2 1/2 years. Thx.