From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: =?UTF-8?Q?Cl=C3=A9ment?= Pit--Claudel Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#25671: Feature request: emacs -Q --script as a single binary Date: Fri, 10 Feb 2017 11:45:55 -0500 Message-ID: References: <4d463814-5439-da70-d3af-b9e603121f8a@live.com> <83lgte4hto.fsf@gnu.org> <372ac0e0-a3d1-70ba-efe0-2e1519088c57@live.com> <831sv63x8b.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="VRAMm4BWQbTbi8DmcgJp5EpgwJU6Gpm4k" X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1486745232 683 195.159.176.226 (10 Feb 2017 16:47:12 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 10 Feb 2017 16:47:12 +0000 (UTC) User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.7.0 Cc: 25671@debbugs.gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Feb 10 17:47:07 2017 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1ccELi-0008Eo-O8 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Fri, 10 Feb 2017 17:47:06 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:44782 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ccELo-00008u-A5 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Fri, 10 Feb 2017 11:47:12 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:54979) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ccELj-00007a-4U for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 10 Feb 2017 11:47:07 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ccELe-0000sd-9m for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 10 Feb 2017 11:47:07 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:36731) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ccELe-0000sS-6J for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 10 Feb 2017 11:47:02 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1ccELd-0006RN-Ks for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 10 Feb 2017 11:47:01 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: =?UTF-8?Q?Cl=C3=A9ment?= Pit--Claudel Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Fri, 10 Feb 2017 16:47:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 25671 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 25671-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B25671.148674517224701 (code B ref 25671); Fri, 10 Feb 2017 16:47:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 25671) by debbugs.gnu.org; 10 Feb 2017 16:46:12 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:34930 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1ccEKq-0006QK-EO for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 10 Feb 2017 11:46:12 -0500 Original-Received: from mout.kundenserver.de ([212.227.126.130]:62355) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1ccEKo-0006Q3-Lw for 25671@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 10 Feb 2017 11:46:11 -0500 Original-Received: from [18.26.2.123] ([18.26.2.123]) by mrelayeu.kundenserver.de (mreue002 [212.227.15.168]) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 0MBezu-1ckRHJ2lAE-00AZYt; Fri, 10 Feb 2017 17:46:03 +0100 In-Reply-To: <831sv63x8b.fsf@gnu.org> X-Provags-ID: V03:K0:lhg0o1aIhJghuaD4XTWcZp+2fEpKaYYlYbDhj93NE289ef/ydlr Db5DoVkM/wEZSNc/Pb/1XUwFQSEJ7mHL5J4tD9MY1Kpr7gkkrXI3kv1/PC77LWq6fR3Op5e 4eOnprLvcF84zS0eRnxHlXzOA2T4XMYGou8k2ELcR0WRjcy57/KNFraNij/Pc2S4uzQs20e 2gwpfrQuoR4ku+P2bXY/w== X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V01:K0:BtE2HZ3NgyM=:zF9yzdj/6LMKrK0emII4dY 6HOEQ+T44YdA6FQcdotxUzHeuhPKrvJMRP9oW0XQrX46JXLVCsQqCa8wJXSBZiYZl2Hc/Qc7l QhRNvpJZR5BSng565JeCLI3mawJb8KNNlDA2vUO6b3EwI61JPWFPvsILKMXcmu82fjUS7D8hQ U85EkI77FufKUWVMndrfk1ftNVEvQAoFwzgInhMnpsZmWKgSkPU6ojD7MlG3pfQ8R+7nYgSXq zHljSLN9DjTZXkHNCqXJd1sM8v/CGryN+9yVeoxYJuO1t/X/JrDMCxDrrdUTLkEu+6QkCsCEY /UiITkJzTELkme+Jc38GLZpdEHKhGzH4BIzK8yvlXOStFyMUN39RYgMaYqyIW/83oNPCsgc8i q5qvbBmjCzQGoC3emRBMmDpRP8wOgJFOjhgjfl5Wqif35U70JFp5cjS8h8rLPHk8fv6afmup0 V2TVXf2g8yt9dIF0HKoE8kK8FwQ7CZmX0088s6j3YLIptf2uUdKPgrGCPxJXswaTFo0JiwM4a lOG1h+XB9zKsKraTPstM89oC+ofS0w5R4Q78pmzQ9kVX+sFWj9l5C7VcJFT2WYDUuKnqlUirw cXqKurPYhZQrxWSzmeOvlT6L0prXUHNv5xPP4tjiAdvqmV2aetSgIQLjzofml0PKRLr8YdGDm Vj19DCcoafBWK4QA9WXIQGPiIc9ZNyLCqYbNSlRIJ2UPTxce5uBuz5NUBNns0mrLenmE= X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 208.118.235.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:129208 Archived-At: This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 4880 and 3156) --VRAMm4BWQbTbi8DmcgJp5EpgwJU6Gpm4k Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="5SWmi7n28dbJx1o4uNGnIUWHTfbAWg27W"; protected-headers="v1" From: =?UTF-8?Q?Cl=c3=a9ment_Pit--Claudel?= To: Eli Zaretskii Cc: 25671@debbugs.gnu.org Message-ID: Subject: Re: bug#25671: Feature request: emacs -Q --script as a single binary References: <4d463814-5439-da70-d3af-b9e603121f8a@live.com> <83lgte4hto.fsf@gnu.org> <372ac0e0-a3d1-70ba-efe0-2e1519088c57@live.com> <831sv63x8b.fsf@gnu.org> In-Reply-To: <831sv63x8b.fsf@gnu.org> --5SWmi7n28dbJx1o4uNGnIUWHTfbAWg27W Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 2017-02-10 10:02, Eli Zaretskii wrote: >> Cc: 25671@debbugs.gnu.org >> From: Cl=C3=A9ment Pit--Claudel >> Date: Fri, 10 Feb 2017 09:17:00 -0500 >> >>> I believe changing the program behavior depending on how it was named= >>> in the command that invoked it is against GNU coding standards. >> >> What about providing elisp or emacs-script as a separate binary? >=20 > What about it? Would that be OK? Could it work? I thought it would make implementation = simpler to just make the emacs binary ct differently based on how its inv= oked, but if that's not OK then could we distribute a separate "elisp" or= "emacs-script" binary that can be used in a shebang line? --5SWmi7n28dbJx1o4uNGnIUWHTfbAWg27W-- --VRAMm4BWQbTbi8DmcgJp5EpgwJU6Gpm4k Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJYne5DAAoJEPqg+cTm90wjHO8QAKV9FBdWblGtC9xh1aCMScJT a3yDZ6gxe4Sk4KoUWHDIclHS4ryXp5lcPT7RibSUGil07SxxJ6KrfMme6AktjXhB O5aVJj/WUJM82Ts3wv0tZFV7r+TQYGlMg9rxCAcTFweMSJ2/RX8l1xXEuthv7QoV qsOJYhv+ArUGvxDSiDxeN50upCFwqXOP9DlvI/ntPXb5kSwNFiZwD7Y40e0/h2QL 4+ZQaRfxRwW1RMfL+h5HfAZkx4YatNc7DzInvb5pAnK2e/tEnCHJTDjDMR28NjvT SNe5L2C9bGJyYVfOI2KyNQPsY33u9njZvw22LjgidlmbxtcJ6visn6ztnmYNE7+h F3vjKx/ksW6XY5Z1IX0eOJcO9zPhLr1khbi0Jo2DXLSz8obSSRLxU62D/HYM66kQ R6Y60H0qxJpjkuF2RuxQM3SAq/QSLvT5OfpylBifIBtM0eMEslBqCC1aWqGmtd3/ HO5NOlvCUJpLCDpa5S4HW05YDJJWShMZDzU0DvUsELKh+HyzDbXO6oR2CsV81i2n /Yz8NS5VvF0hYSxIPp18me2V2Z3ncTmPBI4j0X7syPWE/Dk4PPBC/HE4n/At10SV Opjdkm9yJExhUpe9v6p+apz3sHxaNqd6edNw4G0etZXSqrG5VouSRO4EnhcWnl0P t8zxUfT7X2KlMsGfchjz =ly1o -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --VRAMm4BWQbTbi8DmcgJp5EpgwJU6Gpm4k--