From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Dmitry Gutov Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#52467: 29.0.50; Use pop-to-buffer for shell Date: Mon, 20 Dec 2021 02:34:56 +0300 Message-ID: References: <87sfuorb39.fsf@gnus.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="26550"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.13.0 Cc: sds@gnu.org, Theodor Thornhill , 52467@debbugs.gnu.org To: Lars Ingebrigtsen Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Mon Dec 20 00:37:13 2021 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1mz5jt-0006i0-7o for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Mon, 20 Dec 2021 00:37:13 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:59146 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mz5jq-0005dH-Sj for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Sun, 19 Dec 2021 18:37:10 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:58772) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mz5ji-0005d7-3T for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 19 Dec 2021 18:37:02 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:36928) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mz5jh-00068l-RV for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 19 Dec 2021 18:37:01 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1mz5jh-0002DC-P0 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 19 Dec 2021 18:37:01 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Dmitry Gutov Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sun, 19 Dec 2021 23:37:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 52467 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Original-Received: via spool by 52467-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B52467.16399569658433 (code B ref 52467); Sun, 19 Dec 2021 23:37:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 52467) by debbugs.gnu.org; 19 Dec 2021 23:36:05 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:48474 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1mz5in-0002Bw-Ij for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 19 Dec 2021 18:36:05 -0500 Original-Received: from mail-wr1-f53.google.com ([209.85.221.53]:35822) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1mz5il-0002BS-Am for 52467@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 19 Dec 2021 18:36:04 -0500 Original-Received: by mail-wr1-f53.google.com with SMTP id j18so16566675wrd.2 for <52467@debbugs.gnu.org>; Sun, 19 Dec 2021 15:36:03 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=sender:subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id:date:user-agent :mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language:content-transfer-encoding; bh=K34sdfLDXuZ83GMFrT5zZ0t9+vzdNjrFn9OGQNG6XK0=; b=K4jGz7EIxIKUmyjJu8TvVJOYQ2Yp4QBXIGcf4lXZ6oIP3L8B+5SWPIWJofvH08D1Fq 8VOjyTHtkjvmJtOQeLSq63xDRxJtRaVp2BP5ASyPH3tesnoXB0bMRGdpOxOk36hn54DI UJBqKIvOuBSAb6yoJvHuttgLD31EDlwYyj/j1t+17Z7wI+O88f3qWHajHR7uaEB2EuyM TsmcToVUiejxRaqAbuP6Exl2fAUadF+ZdeVnxuY7UmPGD7MSubklfxUExkCOezyYc4WR 9cEORoLbbNbeUeOAqhhiI+e+x+g0npruq/pmLgJ1scWSbkroW1ZzpYGYBZqOO7+4RCnL GHwg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:sender:subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id :date:user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language :content-transfer-encoding; bh=K34sdfLDXuZ83GMFrT5zZ0t9+vzdNjrFn9OGQNG6XK0=; b=ohIejDQois4L1VCsJEeKXugg+0fkvBJrdDRMBQorNhgwtjUcpz+/97qExZoNYT1AS5 bh8iT/hsolxO3P3JDD1GEEORcVM3za3CbRg8i0TswTp5Tks8c+y9wK4i5MgdX760uyEq hF2W4LnJk37gLwTDS6p7o6x1HfB4A8zop+R1yoEJ6jeMW3mLNOPosCEo6Ku1B0TsFe5X oSxVxMjObPRYkjCLnOqR+ubYWp8tV0hCSHURNhaFKTC5S7HzI7g4uxX6mF4+ak1SAqjf ZqKJFOdjY6xoBH3ZSbXxx94ieaHdaTE25xcIztgiElg1NgkydijfDs2It0vIyIK1OMiy Bjaw== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM533X8S96Bn+sEHSKxAGs7Bg/cSOcj4UZLBmRMVuX+lmJjXEH3MmA UidbbvX7Cvywcv2Jr54ymRo= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzxN/vfdAldvrxGY1xEfrXh86tz76jbvV7mJlAcRmfWrX8lc5UZlvszyNfid4AhQG/fxPNoPA== X-Received: by 2002:adf:e3cf:: with SMTP id k15mr10744173wrm.30.1639956957464; Sun, 19 Dec 2021 15:35:57 -0800 (PST) Original-Received: from [10.112.52.244] ([185.213.155.252]) by smtp.googlemail.com with ESMTPSA id o4sm19431936wmq.31.2021.12.19.15.35.56 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Sun, 19 Dec 2021 15:35:56 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <87sfuorb39.fsf@gnus.org> Content-Language: en-US X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:222756 Archived-At: On 19.12.2021 16:14, Lars Ingebrigtsen wrote: > Dmitry Gutov writes: > >> On 13.12.2021 19:16, Steingold wrote: >>> It seems much more reasonable to use pop-to-buffer in eshell rather than >>> break shell's behavior. >> >> That seems reasonable too. >> >> I think we'll do whatever the maintainers decide on this issue. > > I think the current behaviour makes more sense than the old one, really. > For one, it's more predictable -- when you say `M-x shell', you're > getting a shell in the current buffer. In the current _window_, right? >The old behaviour either does > that, or lands you in a different window (if you've already got a shell > buffer open elsewhere), right? To be fair, it might be considered a little inconsistent still. Like, you get a shell (or eshell) buffer in the current window, but if some shell/eshell buffer already exists, you get that (existing) buffer in the current window. One could expect something else still: a new buffer in the current default-directory. Meaning, an [e]shell buffer that corresponds (in some way) to the buffer that was previously displayed in that window. Or to phrase that in a way similar to yours: a shell buffer in the current window that's related to the current buffer.