From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: martin rudalics Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#44180: 28.0.50; Emacs frames won't redisplay unless resized Date: Tue, 27 Oct 2020 10:08:18 +0100 Message-ID: References: <87wnzgkdsj.fsf@ericabrahamsen.net> <83k0vgiyub.fsf@gnu.org> <87k0vgkbgq.fsf@ericabrahamsen.net> <83eeloivgc.fsf@gnu.org> <87lffw1wjv.fsf@ericabrahamsen.net> <7f32498b-1293-f1ee-5636-8ddd5bbff6c1@gmx.at> <87h7qjpeam.fsf@ericabrahamsen.net> <831rhmgx6x.fsf@gnu.org> <874kmipa5r.fsf@ericabrahamsen.net> <9ee49070-b0be-a775-18a2-3c9ee587210b@gmx.at> <87tuugn4ty.fsf@ericabrahamsen.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="16444"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: 44180@debbugs.gnu.org To: Eric Abrahamsen Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Tue Oct 27 10:09:36 2020 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1kXKz0-00048F-Dk for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Tue, 27 Oct 2020 10:09:34 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:59218 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kXKyz-00067p-8c for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Tue, 27 Oct 2020 05:09:33 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:43362) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kXKyU-00065v-Me for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 27 Oct 2020 05:09:02 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:59534) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kXKyU-0007mv-BS for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 27 Oct 2020 05:09:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kXKyU-0003pQ-6K for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 27 Oct 2020 05:09:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: martin rudalics Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Tue, 27 Oct 2020 09:09:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 44180 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Original-Received: via spool by 44180-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B44180.160378972114679 (code B ref 44180); Tue, 27 Oct 2020 09:09:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 44180) by debbugs.gnu.org; 27 Oct 2020 09:08:41 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:42846 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kXKy8-0003oc-SK for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 27 Oct 2020 05:08:41 -0400 Original-Received: from mout.gmx.net ([212.227.17.22]:37591) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kXKy6-0003nM-Dh for 44180@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 27 Oct 2020 05:08:39 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=gmx.net; s=badeba3b8450; t=1603789700; bh=Z5MSKcw+j8Fed0frpMmDdTaV2Kaav0TThBvmklN7ujU=; h=X-UI-Sender-Class:Subject:To:Cc:References:From:Date:In-Reply-To; b=ajC6s+g8dLNZLYR4OBYGRRpfsOIM61Uq34K7HfUyNjpdHiRq9gTJaxRmtqwNgm3hZ Y6pnx2EsCXLEa+D+z4AKFh6hYnJ9/KVrD+3Z0BAGRRIdB1iwVYOIlIodN2c+Qh9Dy/ 6/jf915NiCg6jUIq10BwUeetBKGPRVDhMeCdMh3U= X-UI-Sender-Class: 01bb95c1-4bf8-414a-932a-4f6e2808ef9c Original-Received: from [192.168.1.102] ([46.125.249.107]) by mail.gmx.com (mrgmx105 [212.227.17.168]) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 1MnakX-1k5OXh2jrh-00jaL3; Tue, 27 Oct 2020 10:08:20 +0100 In-Reply-To: <87tuugn4ty.fsf@ericabrahamsen.net> Content-Language: en-US X-Provags-ID: V03:K1:XW9PvYtm92QNH6KcQ8yjFWhBnIxXGORygkqSgf1iK0LlwvtDRtX XtYW4DxQkO4fSXtVli/IORrrKNKbSi8NeL26sf7aUsjHYSM5iZ+J2R3mtGhYgGbEWso/cb1 U9Ipb7yMvUM6jTXEHLUwu6v5X5Wxeq7/E8ZwU8nSCl1Ov5CYDnrK4/Bh6HxF6YcFzPS3xFr wslkEulc5O1QuFkkl5wzQ== X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V03:K0:mLxl5jez8Jw=:d2TBVz7YwI8SGF8+60I22G uo9LLcfanBzMhQcrih1DG+aCaxmPo1AVJtPC8PjLhd87iqWVk7fY70bQsknnMyMoMLeKqP84d x2xwwRh9BmqrF4Ulopzs6iRaqa2XAzNsLkIxMaHUMJqlyTxrrtHPi8mtHgy8ExOcNxuVJ5yoC gJi+N3N0sVUWpzhbyqVZP7mDXiOdp3A0SLdirTT98h/095Jq/OZTwicA9l/32b1i5ZR2tH5DL bDC0iIDct/atZ1cjskduyYX1GWzgz5apRBuZzPsRtB3rQFerWaFovk+zvwhgWrarHvctxrh8p sXOOKNERxRYWh6+cHEXT/vtvxYHiifwhXoUhdB5NO7IqH5b8VANseZMgPLQTnRa5G3lVhzktg yax3hWkglN5O9Mikj79yCkE5ynf4gO0+SckwcNza9KoGFAQgV6Ku36zGHMbq/YEohAbWUwQzF jrg+3SMJn/iHxBrC/BO7gT+YiTNMGUG5DGoGIqSEQZ+jPIkmB9jzwA7tPckO45tr0F5GGon9u iNl8fRVhcwmSTjZBdPh3KDwHfWRPePjFVhHrfmTilApVxfxmaIOisoPZGZuySqpDhxST2yqDi zqfgRNDRh/aaTyqKZSG8PAyc2g1KO6tfvjKNEg5DGcJrZg8nqpGyv7eeGW7ayFQWiRfMoOo6e 2p+GdZYijzIoEX6jkB24cyZU7CxyOYFf/h7L+0ZW+Bsm31pvNSWA/OV/uNQRUnmnWm13zYYOW oWs2QKgXMkiO/rmE3Et+zV29HXMteUadewWCtREBAyUt2MThGnelmgyfjy53gAS1TQCrcc+M X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:191714 Archived-At: >> Do you get the corresponding focus events (whatever they are now) when >> you make another frame the fullscreen one? If so, we should probably >> redraw the frame in that case. > > I'm still not at the offending computer, but I think there's a high > likelihood of confusing myself with conflicting terminology here so, > just to be clear: this isn't proper fullscreening in the X11 sense. I didn't expect it to be but thanks for confirming. > i3 > also does that, but I hardly ever use it since the stacked layout is > close enough to full screen. In X11 terms I think all that's happening > is switching of focus between windows, it's just that i3's layout means > that the unfocused windows are always completely obscured. For some > reason Emacs now thinks that a window being obscured means that it's now > an icon. Switching focus back to that window does not un-iconify it. Always keep in mind that Emacs has no idea about whether and how a window has been iconified or focused. It just waits for the corresponding information from the window manager, believes what the latter tells and acts (redrawing a frame, for example) accordingly. > Anyway, more later in the day... martin