From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Juanma Barranquero Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#5294: 23.1; unload-feature disable minor-mode Date: Sun, 3 Jan 2010 02:41:07 +0100 Message-ID: References: <87aawwp631.fsf@blah.blah> <87tyv4njo7.fsf@blah.blah> <87iqbkf15l.fsf@blah.blah> Reply-To: Juanma Barranquero , 5294@debbugs.gnu.org NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1262483361 14917 80.91.229.12 (3 Jan 2010 01:49:21 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 3 Jan 2010 01:49:21 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 5294@debbugs.gnu.org To: Kevin Ryde Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun Jan 03 02:49:13 2010 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1NRFag-0001ZR-4u for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sun, 03 Jan 2010 02:49:10 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:46205 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1NRFag-0001sJ-E4 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sat, 02 Jan 2010 20:49:10 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1NRFad-0001s6-4A for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 02 Jan 2010 20:49:07 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1NRFaR-0001qz-Vq for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 02 Jan 2010 20:49:05 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=45248 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1NRFaR-0001qw-OW for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 02 Jan 2010 20:48:55 -0500 Original-Received: from [140.186.70.43] (port=42951 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1NRFaR-00071l-Gp for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 02 Jan 2010 20:48:55 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1NRFTm-0001QJ-5C; Sat, 02 Jan 2010 20:42:02 -0500 X-Loop: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Mail-Followup-To: Juanma Barranquero , 5294@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-From: Juanma Barranquero Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-To: owner@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sun, 03 Jan 2010 01:42:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org X-Emacs-PR-Message: followup 5294 X-Emacs-PR-Package: emacs X-Emacs-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 5294-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B5294.12624828955461 (code B ref 5294); Sun, 03 Jan 2010 01:42:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 5294) by debbugs.gnu.org; 3 Jan 2010 01:41:35 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1NRFTL-0001Q2-31 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 02 Jan 2010 20:41:35 -0500 Original-Received: from mail-bw0-f216.google.com ([209.85.218.216]) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1NRFTH-0001Pw-KY for 5294@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 02 Jan 2010 20:41:33 -0500 Original-Received: by bwz8 with SMTP id 8so9050271bwz.39 for <5294@debbugs.gnu.org>; Sat, 02 Jan 2010 17:41:27 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :from:date:message-id:subject:to:cc:content-type; bh=SpxrpW3rXgaA9OrM/BrcMU8/gTfT+5Gnxl1lv6OqbYg=; b=qW6zzaW0UtfTlN9+RaiY0Ztllty322KQptgOL8Myist5C+eZWJyAl3Vuh4SkyQT+b/ 0bnj9WHS+LSFsQQdMpkzR82UwQ1QjyWkc1amhmJI0tRnlbLmyEKekvR2X8raOyXo+uHV 9pyUexjg38HPREs/2f0GHGz2K4nBQQ01Ws97I= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type; b=UDyLQZB+jRbUSLBjCpOXlI4IjThaQEpx+/pVZKnaehLMHTZEHbUtdcZdarfYlUa7Od o73KnADcsCDF8CB5/pbhsKvE/22EiMydfxUpJvf7Dbkv6KYgwUndcGTQCs3/fGBwFnd5 sQ0t6OPb/sCS0MzN9uGMMpQm3DF3id64XrqNU= Original-Received: by 10.204.3.152 with SMTP id 24mr2979168bkn.168.1262482887086; Sat, 02 Jan 2010 17:41:27 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <87iqbkf15l.fsf@blah.blah> X-Spam-Score: -2.7 (--) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list X-Spam-Score: -2.7 (--) Resent-Date: Sat, 02 Jan 2010 20:42:02 -0500 X-detected-operating-system: by monty-python.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:33884 Archived-At: On Sun, Jan 3, 2010 at 02:05, Kevin Ryde wrote: > Sounds like it could have been better to do those latter actions > irrespective of the hook. Let only the FOO-unload-function say not to > do them, for the rare cases they're unwanted. The now-obsolete functionality (for FOO-unload-hook, not unload-feature in general) was confusing, badly designed and ill-documented; changing it would have been backward incompatible, not to mention fragile. It was better to add a new way. The current FOO-feature-function was added because in most cases, it's the package's responsibility to know how to unload itself. For the few cases that do not, there's always advising; but perhaps `unload-feature-functions' would be a good idea, and there's no worry about compatibility. Juanma