From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: "Juanma Barranquero" Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#641: format-time-string %Z does not work, starting with Emacs 22.2 Date: Thu, 7 Aug 2008 05:16:53 +0200 Message-ID: References: <4897737C.90709@gmx.at> <001501c8f67e$7c63b300$0200a8c0@us.oracle.com> <008601c8f756$9bce0f00$0200a8c0@us.oracle.com> <00a001c8f786$fa665d30$0200a8c0@us.oracle.com> <00ff01c8f7fd$5d92d6b0$0200a8c0@us.oracle.com> <013301c8f818$fdf19270$0200a8c0@us.oracle.com> Reply-To: Juanma Barranquero , 641@emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1218079668 4839 80.91.229.12 (7 Aug 2008 03:27:48 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 7 Aug 2008 03:27:48 +0000 (UTC) Cc: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org, 641@emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com To: "Drew Adams" Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Aug 07 05:28:39 2008 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1KQwB2-00061s-6A for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Thu, 07 Aug 2008 05:28:36 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:56027 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1KQwA6-0003Nn-Lz for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Wed, 06 Aug 2008 23:27:38 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1KQwA2-0003LE-2p for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 06 Aug 2008 23:27:34 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1KQw9z-0003IX-P0 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 06 Aug 2008 23:27:33 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=34450 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1KQw9z-0003IU-K1 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 06 Aug 2008 23:27:31 -0400 Original-Received: from rzlab.ucr.edu ([138.23.92.77]:58159) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1KQw9z-0001OI-Cp for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 06 Aug 2008 23:27:31 -0400 Original-Received: from rzlab.ucr.edu (rzlab.ucr.edu [127.0.0.1]) by rzlab.ucr.edu (8.13.8/8.13.8/Debian-3) with ESMTP id m773RNbb026508; Wed, 6 Aug 2008 20:27:23 -0700 Original-Received: (from debbugs@localhost) by rzlab.ucr.edu (8.13.8/8.13.8/Submit) id m773P5KX025324; Wed, 6 Aug 2008 20:25:05 -0700 X-Loop: don@donarmstrong.com Resent-From: "Juanma Barranquero" Resent-To: bug-submit-list@donarmstrong.com Resent-CC: Emacs Bugs , don@donarmstrong.com Resent-Date: Thu, 07 Aug 2008 03:25:05 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: don@donarmstrong.com X-Emacs-PR-Message: report 641 X-Emacs-PR-Package: emacs,w32 X-Emacs-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by submit@emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com id=B.121807902123521 (code B ref -1); Thu, 07 Aug 2008 03:25:05 +0000 Original-Received: (at submit) by emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com; 7 Aug 2008 03:17:01 +0000 Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [199.232.76.165]) by rzlab.ucr.edu (8.13.8/8.13.8/Debian-3) with ESMTP id m773GvAu023515 for ; Wed, 6 Aug 2008 20:16:58 -0700 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1KQvzl-0005eB-7f for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 06 Aug 2008 23:16:57 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1KQvzi-0005Xz-EW for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 06 Aug 2008 23:16:55 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=52349 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1KQvzi-0005Xt-Bl for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 06 Aug 2008 23:16:54 -0400 Original-Received: from nf-out-0910.google.com ([64.233.182.187]:49207) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1KQvzi-0000FY-8Z for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 06 Aug 2008 23:16:54 -0400 Original-Received: by nf-out-0910.google.com with SMTP id c7so98398nfi.26 for ; Wed, 06 Aug 2008 20:16:53 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to :subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; bh=tJviLzYksu6LDTupZLFi9JT++aq+sJ8JPxV67AnP2c4=; b=RpDBltvJ6oCA0Qr2c/QiKAN0odO7J8B/omaI9V1JqqKnSO/GjMGsym2X+ZBNzZrhDc KD48NC7jRFAfPCeo/k28mi1RMod8RDbDiCDZ9kTbsHFL7EpNEpMr48GIWlG9WKOOyDqz sb8AzO7AWAJFohtZQMLcvZv8DW+tgvjB84ffs= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition :references; b=oeRB6NGM1MSTu6VJpZxzZH2+VKVabEqgM2gotkPF2+TGbeXn3ZV77oOcvWZilcxJOC 7VG9etyIfIA/2jXGY9/3nG187kW7JsYu+ciHINPC+aFc7HvSdWLSkJveONBTQFBAdFj8 R5N3O14C+73uLR80MusDW6uesYq5J8VprCZco= Original-Received: by 10.210.89.4 with SMTP id m4mr3372343ebb.132.1218079013250; Wed, 06 Aug 2008 20:16:53 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: by 10.210.71.14 with HTTP; Wed, 6 Aug 2008 20:16:53 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <013301c8f818$fdf19270$0200a8c0@us.oracle.com> Content-Disposition: inline X-detected-kernel: by monty-python.gnu.org: Linux 2.6 (newer, 2) X-CrossAssassin-Score: 2 X-detected-kernel: by monty-python.gnu.org: Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) Resent-Date: Wed, 06 Aug 2008 23:27:33 -0400 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:19087 Archived-At: On Thu, Aug 7, 2008 at 01:05, Drew Adams wrote: > But I feel > nevertheless that we should continue to provide some way to produce a timezone > name (on Windows), however rudimentary, language-specific, or non-compliant that > name might be. IMHO, Windows timezone names (because of its non-standard nature, localization and, often, bad translations) are a waste of time and we should not invest resources in trying to do anything with them. Juanma