From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: "Juanma Barranquero" Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: Re: Info-clone-buffer-hook should be renamed Date: Thu, 6 Dec 2007 23:57:11 +0100 Message-ID: References: NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1196981850 9307 80.91.229.12 (6 Dec 2007 22:57:30 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 6 Dec 2007 22:57:30 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Bug-Gnu-Emacs To: "Drew Adams" Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Dec 06 23:57:40 2007 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1J0Pf2-0000aV-65 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Thu, 06 Dec 2007 23:57:40 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1J0Pel-00077T-9e for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Thu, 06 Dec 2007 17:57:23 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1J0Pee-00075l-I2 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 06 Dec 2007 17:57:16 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1J0Pee-000754-2w for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 06 Dec 2007 17:57:16 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1J0Ped-00074w-Mb for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 06 Dec 2007 17:57:15 -0500 Original-Received: from wa-out-1112.google.com ([209.85.146.178]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1J0Ped-0002E4-Dz for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 06 Dec 2007 17:57:15 -0500 Original-Received: by wa-out-1112.google.com with SMTP id k34so915695wah for ; Thu, 06 Dec 2007 14:57:11 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; bh=NTYMwVb23AbxXEaErWMfOp3Q/aShwrij/GJH6m0A8/k=; b=UZJs3X46+u6kUkzf63ED8t15fka8p4w7ph6DZJ/8NB0Ymq68nWCD7UWw75mOB12pUkUl+AJVJBS+l2K6QBb02FomiEXLeSI58Rkfq6KH6/kFYcOZU6C0QCyHeH3YLuZ1oZnnxjpAavG2da7rZ4VH9fivdDytdoaktEPBb1N+UuU= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=YzqR0H1SBcJaLU2B2EWfdleojaQ+1MuAg5wyhN5uF88mYJigRbs1Gde5rUoyjjSadm/eSk/PCcoAju6xPzSmPKPGKkCsBxkjeSgbw7Y0OMtksfxRGTlZJ00sZmIDK1Vv0WtCanRn7tt0FU7GSD9v1kzZXmaaZT6sxEwmrlpiPfA= Original-Received: by 10.115.94.1 with SMTP id w1mr2182889wal.1196981831866; Thu, 06 Dec 2007 14:57:11 -0800 (PST) Original-Received: by 10.114.170.5 with HTTP; Thu, 6 Dec 2007 14:57:11 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: Content-Disposition: inline X-detected-kernel: by monty-python.gnu.org: Linux 2.6 (newer, 2) X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:17137 Archived-At: On Dec 6, 2007 11:51 PM, Drew Adams wrote: > It's OK if the function name says to do something with a hook (e.g. `add-hook', `mmm-run-major-mode-hook'), but I don't see it as appropriate for many of those you cited. Just one opinion, of course. My point is that using -hook for functions, and specifically for functions intended to be added to a hook, is a long-standing convention. Juanma