From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Hong Xu Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#37655: 27.0.50; reversing `gnus-thread-sort-by-most-recent-date' does not work properly Date: Wed, 9 Oct 2019 14:08:51 -0700 Message-ID: References: <7ad0a3df-fba5-748a-885d-981176e1a015@topbug.net> <87woddu4t4.fsf@ericabrahamsen.net> <871rvltytw.fsf@ericabrahamsen.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Injection-Info: blaine.gmane.org; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:195.159.176.226"; logging-data="140679"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@blaine.gmane.org" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.9.0 Cc: 37655@debbugs.gnu.org, larsi@gnus.org To: Eric Abrahamsen Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Oct 09 23:54:24 2019 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1iIJuZ-000aRj-7p for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Wed, 09 Oct 2019 23:54:23 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:60138 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1iIJuY-0006Xq-5n for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Wed, 09 Oct 2019 17:54:22 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:44728) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1iIJCh-0003Ft-Sd for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 09 Oct 2019 17:09:05 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1iIJCg-0007vP-Ma for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 09 Oct 2019 17:09:03 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:45443) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1iIJCg-0007vJ-H8 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 09 Oct 2019 17:09:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1iIJCg-0008T5-Bu for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 09 Oct 2019 17:09:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Hong Xu Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Wed, 09 Oct 2019 21:09:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 37655 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Original-Received: via spool by 37655-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B37655.157065533732538 (code B ref 37655); Wed, 09 Oct 2019 21:09:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 37655) by debbugs.gnu.org; 9 Oct 2019 21:08:57 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:54264 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1iIJCb-0008Sk-2I for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 09 Oct 2019 17:08:57 -0400 Original-Received: from sender4-of-o54.zoho.com ([136.143.188.54]:21448) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1iIJCa-0008Sc-0z for 37655@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 09 Oct 2019 17:08:56 -0400 ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1570655334; cv=none; d=zoho.com; s=zohoarc; b=ep7DlHZ4anacSvZSd6BbVXWM1vVgbpv8xJ6hZ5mVTCJZBDpxpMDBsalA4Ds8LCm2xdf0SapEpEYs2PMXbKddalhNXu6FbUDIWUXS5Jc0/b6Y79La2rLs2ar8MaaFNdhMhpG1V8erQLZE7ZceXoRJ9nhWTfgofVHSunJHi4AhoZ8= ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=zoho.com; s=zohoarc; t=1570655334; h=Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Cc:Date:From:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Message-ID:References:Subject:To; bh=2TCNbUE151AgK/aVgcxC2XJM4dcqts2CBzuPKG6uh4w=; b=U84jUs85EQGZIK4nBEFFnzWue/jBi5w5jFOqaLM9P7b54tjGvZrwuNC/kubOebo+QyPzujLtQwGaaz820LUd/xtKUdmDS2bxkV8L7YF6CO++ApeYHlH2BsSjtP1M1kk8o2VqZVq6nMB+M42XArh+/Lxs9bgte+djkyViHESIelY= ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.zoho.com; dkim=pass header.i=topbug.net; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=hong@topbug.net; dmarc=pass header.from= header.from= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; t=1570655334; s=zoho; d=topbug.net; i=hong@topbug.net; h=Subject:To:Cc:References:From:Message-ID:Date:MIME-Version:In-Reply-To:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; l=1292; bh=2TCNbUE151AgK/aVgcxC2XJM4dcqts2CBzuPKG6uh4w=; b=hWz4lK4tnX1MCir6Xit2BpT8h7Hd0yc/lxvXznEw/LVicfsD2zm8xbSmRJS1XuvJ nQOjEZXMs2WBKbzVwyufRWlO1rSTu+8QWZN5QwScWmeQpAHyV2AtEYgTg7eHurJwPc3 ZJfIGm+8i3cS/XFOL4oFGSUCwwxmPEwFvmov8qFo= Original-Received: from [192.168.88.88] (69-215-149-151.lightspeed.sntcca.sbcglobal.net [69.215.149.151]) by mx.zohomail.com with SMTPS id 1570655332711425.27020142433867; Wed, 9 Oct 2019 14:08:52 -0700 (PDT) Openpgp: preference=signencrypt In-Reply-To: <871rvltytw.fsf@ericabrahamsen.net> Content-Language: en-US X-ZohoMailClient: External X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 209.51.188.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:168803 Archived-At: On 10/9/19 2:04 PM, Eric Abrahamsen wrote: > Hong Xu writes: > >> On 10/9/19 11:55 AM, Eric Abrahamsen wrote: >>> I can reproduce this, but oddly it only seems to have gone wrong for >>> that one thread -- all the other threads in the mailbox seem to be >>> sorted correctly. I also note that the Summary buffer displays the date >>> of both messages in the thread as one day earlier than the Date header >>> in the message itself. So I wonder if there's just something weird about >>> one or both of the messages that's causing Gnus to handle the date >>> incorrectly. >>> When I have a bit more time I'll try to figure out what date Gnus is >>> trying to use for that thread. >>> >> >> On my personal messages, there is also only exactly one thread placed >> in the wrong position. My guess is that there may be something on the >> boundary not handled properly during sorting ... > > Ah, I guess that would make sense. Are the dates also displayed > incorrectly in the Summary format line for the messages in that thread? > I don't observe incorrect date. Is there an incorrect date in the example above? I also observed that `gnus-thread-latest-date' does not return correct dates for some messages, although they displayed as in one thread.