On Thu, 2023-02-02 at 11:04 -0500, Stefan Monnier wrote:
> > Alternatively, we could define a macro, store its expanded form in
> > a
> > variable and run it through `cconv-closure-convert`, checking
> > afterwards whether the original value changed or not. It feels a
> > little
> > more reliable, but writing it might be a little tricky.
> 
> I was thinking of doing something like:
> 
>     (let ((f '(lambda () (interactive ...) ...)))
>       (should (equal f
>                      (let ((fc (copy-tree f)))
>                        (byte-compile fc)
>                        fc))))
> 
> 
> -- Stefan
> 

I wrote a variant of this that specifically calls `cconv-closure-
convert`, and checks if the interactive spec has been modified, using
`eq`. It fails on master, and passes with the patch installed.

-- 
Vibhav Pant
vibhavp@gmail.com
GPG: 7ED1 D48C 513C A024 BE3A  785F E3FB 28CB 6AB5 9598