From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Gregory Heytings Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#57499: Documentation bug in the docstring of set-face-attribute? Date: Thu, 01 Sep 2022 11:56:06 +0000 Message-ID: References: <534c9018d2adffda3e53@heytings.org> <831qswu0p4.fsf@gnu.org> <534c9018d2f372cd7462@heytings.org> <83tu5ssi35.fsf@gnu.org> <534c9018d222586a161c@heytings.org> <83r10wsgu8.fsf@gnu.org> <534c9018d2952b7a6bd0@heytings.org> <83pmggs89x.fsf@gnu.org> <534c9018d2597d4fd752@heytings.org> <83fshcrzth.fsf@gnu.org> <534c9018d2c911550778@heytings.org> <83czcgry5f.fsf@gnu.org> <534c9018d2f901e88b93@heytings.org> <837d2nshh7.fsf@gnu.org> <834jxrscu7.fsf@gnu.org> <831qsvs51j.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset=us-ascii Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="2961"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: 57499-done@debbugs.gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Thu Sep 01 14:11:32 2022 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1oTj2i-0000aT-Ha for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Thu, 01 Sep 2022 14:11:32 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:36402 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1oTj2h-0005eM-6K for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Thu, 01 Sep 2022 08:11:31 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:43842) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1oTiog-0007Ud-MD for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 01 Sep 2022 07:57:05 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:51703) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1oTiog-0002pl-CB for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 01 Sep 2022 07:57:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1oTiog-0000az-8S for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 01 Sep 2022 07:57:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Gregory Heytings Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Thu, 01 Sep 2022 11:57:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 57499 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Original-Received: via spool by 57499-done@debbugs.gnu.org id=D57499.16620333722225 (code D ref 57499); Thu, 01 Sep 2022 11:57:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 57499-done) by debbugs.gnu.org; 1 Sep 2022 11:56:12 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:41452 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1oTinr-0000Zp-KB for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 01 Sep 2022 07:56:11 -0400 Original-Received: from heytings.org ([95.142.160.155]:50144) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1oTino-0000Zf-KC for 57499-done@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 01 Sep 2022 07:56:10 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=heytings.org; s=20220101; t=1662033367; bh=WBjMr0euAUyhclxfPmJt17ZWqupSjNEcfga/0DQSIR4=; h=Date:From:To:cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:Message-ID:References:From; b=SOlciLrmaSgWFk4EcpwdJBjWXObqrxWAGbjijaz2HzGD4JQ0+iYMxRt4aJCBzn7/S g9HphsjrrZY1cLAp7+3NzG9QDCOyoi6W0XqT6hzw7mZabqxZ6F7DGXPKT5ulGIqWEe QVY3sMmvb8OKBwuLTuu78hlpJi0K/B+TvWxfShGd9HQxLxTgepwsYk+a85KX3bxyTw ZrlbQ3kSd5yXKMYzatuFKcyc/NS6HpUR/A2qrMxe6KNmgxDe21i8Hx+MtD+Dyxavf4 QPHatWeDba2U3X+nLnwq3QzOTUnRYL58DBA7R5Axefv3tt26L9FCiNYVArxlDddftx RZ6LFOstO+n4w== In-Reply-To: <831qsvs51j.fsf@gnu.org> X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:241253 Archived-At: >> Would the patch below be okay? This would be another way to clarify >> the matter. > > No. I don't want to lose this compatibility feature because lots of > people still use nil. > Would a warning in *Messages* be okay then? People who use nil with frame = t or nil will not get what they expect, right?