From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Paul Eggert Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#26952: 25.1; loops eating all memory while yanking big rectangle Date: Fri, 26 May 2017 23:57:01 -0700 Organization: UCLA Computer Science Department Message-ID: References: <87zie8gyu4.fsf@users.sourceforge.net> <83h90fq269.fsf@gnu.org> <87vaovh1db.fsf@users.sourceforge.net> <8360gvpfxr.fsf@gnu.org> <87shjzgwgk.fsf@users.sourceforge.net> <83y3tqnsab.fsf@gnu.org> <83lgpqng0i.fsf@gnu.org> <83inkto7yz.fsf@gnu.org> <83lgplkm64.fsf@gnu.org> <4dacb636-0cae-9cb6-8491-2630e763d956@cs.ucla.edu> <83a860lupf.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1495868291 3242 195.159.176.226 (27 May 2017 06:58:11 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 27 May 2017 06:58:11 +0000 (UTC) User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.1.1 Cc: jwiegley@gmail.com, 26952@debbugs.gnu.org, npostavs@users.sourceforge.net To: Glenn Morris , Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat May 27 08:58:06 2017 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1dEVfq-0000jl-Ba for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sat, 27 May 2017 08:58:06 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:39646 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dEVfv-0001nT-Nx for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sat, 27 May 2017 02:58:11 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:51513) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dEVfp-0001m9-Gu for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 27 May 2017 02:58:06 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dEVfm-0000jl-FW for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 27 May 2017 02:58:05 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:37146) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dEVfm-0000jM-Bx for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 27 May 2017 02:58:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1dEVfl-0007K4-US for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 27 May 2017 02:58:01 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Paul Eggert Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sat, 27 May 2017 06:58:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 26952 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 26952-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B26952.149586823228081 (code B ref 26952); Sat, 27 May 2017 06:58:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 26952) by debbugs.gnu.org; 27 May 2017 06:57:12 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:39823 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1dEVey-0007Ip-3S for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 27 May 2017 02:57:12 -0400 Original-Received: from zimbra.cs.ucla.edu ([131.179.128.68]:36882) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1dEVev-0007Ia-Tj for 26952@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 27 May 2017 02:57:10 -0400 Original-Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by zimbra.cs.ucla.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0BF511600C4; Fri, 26 May 2017 23:57:03 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: from zimbra.cs.ucla.edu ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (zimbra.cs.ucla.edu [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10032) with ESMTP id kCIQmeDMBJSc; Fri, 26 May 2017 23:57:02 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by zimbra.cs.ucla.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2ACBA1600C8; Fri, 26 May 2017 23:57:02 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at zimbra.cs.ucla.edu Original-Received: from zimbra.cs.ucla.edu ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (zimbra.cs.ucla.edu [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10026) with ESMTP id M2fe5sznaOiN; Fri, 26 May 2017 23:57:02 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: from [192.168.1.9] (unknown [47.153.188.248]) by zimbra.cs.ucla.edu (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 075C81600C4; Fri, 26 May 2017 23:57:02 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: Content-Language: en-US X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 208.118.235.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:132905 Archived-At: Glenn Morris wrote: > I have the feeling (not > backed up by any data) that pretest use is declining, with people just > using master or releases Is there an easy way to tell which fraction of bug reports come from pret= ests vs=20 master vs releases? That might provide some data for how useful pretests = etc.=20 are, for shaking out bugs.