From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Nikolay Kudryavtsev Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#23882: 25.1: loading some desktops from 24.5 results in horizontal scrollbar everywhere Date: Sat, 2 Jul 2016 19:51:25 +0300 Message-ID: References: <094ef993-e6c6-a097-d483-d740e3850134@gmail.com> <8360sotqht.fsf@gnu.org> <69f08a74-00e8-201b-c713-7417b983ad75@gmail.com> <83vb0os3p7.fsf@gnu.org> <83twg8s3cx.fsf@gnu.org> <83r3bcrwzh.fsf@gnu.org> <8377dec5-f8a5-782a-b817-d57a6e2f7812@gmail.com> <83poqwrve5.fsf@gnu.org> <347c27e0-b6b6-4702-2dd6-88ce70da91a8@gmail.com> <83oa6grtfw.fsf@gnu.org> <455bb3ab-963a-3626-e8e7-9877e38c704e@gmail.com> <83k2h4rs6k.fsf@gnu.org> <83fursrphe.fsf@gnu.org> <9183dbbb-b613-85f6-f47e-67144e610304@gmail.com> <83eg7crofx.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1467478409 12758 80.91.229.3 (2 Jul 2016 16:53:29 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 2 Jul 2016 16:53:29 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 23882@debbugs.gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Jul 02 18:53:17 2016 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1bJOAP-0000zv-0M for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sat, 02 Jul 2016 18:53:17 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:39350 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bJOAO-00040K-0c for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sat, 02 Jul 2016 12:53:16 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:42858) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bJOAF-0003yr-Rn for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 02 Jul 2016 12:53:09 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bJOAA-0008Ln-IT for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 02 Jul 2016 12:53:07 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:50727) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bJOAA-0008Lj-FJ for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 02 Jul 2016 12:53:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1bJOAA-0004El-8C for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 02 Jul 2016 12:53:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Nikolay Kudryavtsev Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sat, 02 Jul 2016 16:53:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 23882 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 23882-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B23882.146747832816223 (code B ref 23882); Sat, 02 Jul 2016 16:53:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 23882) by debbugs.gnu.org; 2 Jul 2016 16:52:08 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:34831 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1bJO9H-0004Db-Pi for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 02 Jul 2016 12:52:07 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-lf0-f45.google.com ([209.85.215.45]:36486) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1bJO9G-0004D4-3s for 23882@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 02 Jul 2016 12:52:06 -0400 Original-Received: by mail-lf0-f45.google.com with SMTP id q132so94642472lfe.3 for <23882@debbugs.gnu.org>; Sat, 02 Jul 2016 09:52:05 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=from:subject:to:references:cc:message-id:date:user-agent :mime-version:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=siL5heZ4M+lfeJYctFJk680DraGLvLhkXy07iz0IM1U=; b=oyJXZtYAXX0KJQElkCOBkl1JqdWOGPmNFWaQUuk7X7RzF6+xa8mxv/PX+d3Lfyq/9U afhALBwBg4uX0TKXwNpyx2bFXTVIt1eXN7xWBaY1v7+0IquqButAkR0jqapQH96M+IgI abewlAokqh1+PxJhkZfq2XW4L/rzcswPrzTHlIVreQXG6UsN5/euydSN16lUA92I4vmT 9plsFyOdUaKn66QEbHHMxwEN2mQP7kFcnm8y4lWGTW08ETymHSUL3JUeV3Pu3gev8Mnj yQ6eOlu2qh8xLBh0uRIeETm4ad0jfiEhFTtFa5xX5uqfS3qDkEyFWkP8hz6q/GYOiz19 pIFA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:from:subject:to:references:cc:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=siL5heZ4M+lfeJYctFJk680DraGLvLhkXy07iz0IM1U=; b=CnHIvnI5+80YqNndDC3WYCtDhiRwrR2xhbXqPSxBOnYNR4gLv/pZXyHrvVlA3wX3Ee 4QcKC5EyA8xUKsT6jjKewnvd6H5MxHmsOCur9vffDhlRPzS82kuKMtGryuEJvOkDI4ys 4IeGj6mJnAvH7KFJTmrImVqtWwUANGBDWvUBdoxCUBxodo/0bXaJmXatJ36Sy+gupwUk i2kTpzgRNpny50RPIcpKYjqdD7TfDPFh+g2zMq2AK3IwhCDcCJUP1J5Mh5enyL7nbJFC OVNfxpArmG9WzMxo3JKpIVPkykkhW8ProZZgu0D4eGhMLNi1Yyo/MgKou+qspunvNXzm /BBA== X-Gm-Message-State: ALyK8tJ77EjABIIcVZdM0WmdKSykPLdap6056wsQKc42AURYDCS+fGt0KO0uPonmLnKnzA== X-Received: by 10.25.219.27 with SMTP id s27mr1072334lfg.129.1467478319960; Sat, 02 Jul 2016 09:51:59 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: from [192.168.199.2] (broadband-95-84-209-126.nationalcablenetworks.ru. [95.84.209.126]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id h11sm665916ljh.33.2016.07.02.09.51.58 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Sat, 02 Jul 2016 09:51:59 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Original-From: Nikolay Kudryavtsev User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.2.0 In-Reply-To: <83eg7crofx.fsf@gnu.org> X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 208.118.235.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:120298 Archived-At: Yes, this is sufficient. I guess it's safe to close this bug, but I wish we could hear from someone who could independently reproduce it. Also someone should still probably look into the buffer form thing, but it's not a priority either way, and since the release is imminent, I'm sure there are other things that are way more important. Thanks. -- Best Regards, Nikolay Kudryavtsev