From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Drew Adams Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#31350: 27.0; `pcase' message: "Redundant pcase pattern" Date: Sat, 12 Dec 2020 09:00:34 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: References: <86d352f4-5fa7-4bee-b72c-17e58aace43f@default> <87364hs46h.fsf@gnus.org> <87sgaudiss.fsf@web.de> <8bcc3be5-c9db-4015-8f0f-4efe77ff27ee@default> <87sgau93fh.fsf@web.de> <87v9fqrsvf.fsf@gnus.org> <87zh2j2m44.fsf@gnus.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="9906"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: 31350@debbugs.gnu.org To: Lars Ingebrigtsen , Michael Heerdegen Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Sat Dec 12 19:55:01 2020 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1koA2n-0002R2-Ej for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Sat, 12 Dec 2020 19:55:01 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:46128 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1koA2m-0000Gx-Gm for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Sat, 12 Dec 2020 13:55:00 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:38152) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1ko9kq-0005yN-QW for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 12 Dec 2020 13:36:28 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:34911) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1ko9kq-0008Iy-CB for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 12 Dec 2020 13:36:28 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1ko8HS-0006Vp-JL for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 12 Dec 2020 12:02:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Drew Adams Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sat, 12 Dec 2020 17:02:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 31350 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: fixed moreinfo Original-Received: via spool by 31350-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B31350.160779247024970 (code B ref 31350); Sat, 12 Dec 2020 17:02:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 31350) by debbugs.gnu.org; 12 Dec 2020 17:01:10 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:46313 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1ko8Ga-0006Ue-N0 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 12 Dec 2020 12:01:10 -0500 Original-Received: from aserp2130.oracle.com ([141.146.126.79]:33428) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1ko8GV-0006Ty-Lo for 31350@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 12 Dec 2020 12:01:07 -0500 Original-Received: from pps.filterd (aserp2130.oracle.com [127.0.0.1]) by aserp2130.oracle.com (8.16.0.42/8.16.0.42) with SMTP id 0BCGtV8h172748; Sat, 12 Dec 2020 17:00:56 GMT DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=oracle.com; h=mime-version : message-id : date : from : sender : to : cc : subject : references : in-reply-to : content-type : content-transfer-encoding; s=corp-2020-01-29; bh=aDN/yibsaGE0kVJT9jJ+yk0etij54U7OZKAvkfPDa1w=; b=iyIcqo7KOUyTC4sHbiuUiIbfR7RcQ52bRVbZKlaE3pLLVD3N3NdwuFOnQHJF3qgn7rUk EU2n70TLhW1tGiQC2GzI3XbxvPUzcfpeNaLe96U+4lXdxWqRz+kPFHaFWAKJeS1FI7yO NmfN34rBwd3fKQkhrRvmBdX7oXHQLqICzYAbgkVbmji8FDuyxokExh0fbzZ3KP7w137F bcPajRQl1gWahB9zV/gvTUNq5If1HKOWOtgiVGRGiFKrY99juG/256f07bmmfCWeOuG1 FV3q/Yii7MmhGXg8B5wyQUMkmn2SpTvEMnIr+PCj0gQZGjMg5fBFcxXA1guo3Wrjdhfi tg== Original-Received: from userp3020.oracle.com (userp3020.oracle.com [156.151.31.79]) by aserp2130.oracle.com with ESMTP id 35ckcb16jh-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=FAIL); Sat, 12 Dec 2020 17:00:56 +0000 Original-Received: from pps.filterd (userp3020.oracle.com [127.0.0.1]) by userp3020.oracle.com (8.16.0.42/8.16.0.42) with SMTP id 0BCH0t1f044584; Sat, 12 Dec 2020 17:00:55 GMT Original-Received: from aserv0121.oracle.com (aserv0121.oracle.com [141.146.126.235]) by userp3020.oracle.com with ESMTP id 35cn6h7xsu-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=OK); Sat, 12 Dec 2020 17:00:55 +0000 Original-Received: from abhmp0018.oracle.com (abhmp0018.oracle.com [141.146.116.24]) by aserv0121.oracle.com (8.14.4/8.13.8) with ESMTP id 0BCH0Z05024060; Sat, 12 Dec 2020 17:00:41 GMT In-Reply-To: <87zh2j2m44.fsf@gnus.org> X-Priority: 3 X-Mailer: Oracle Beehive Extensions for Outlook 2.0.1.9.1 (1003210) [OL 16.0.5071.0 (x86)] X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=nai engine=6000 definitions=9833 signatures=668683 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=notspam policy=default score=0 mlxscore=0 spamscore=0 mlxlogscore=999 bulkscore=0 phishscore=0 malwarescore=0 adultscore=0 suspectscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.12.0-2009150000 definitions=main-2012120133 X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=nai engine=6000 definitions=9833 signatures=668683 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=notspam policy=default score=0 bulkscore=0 mlxlogscore=999 priorityscore=1501 mlxscore=0 suspectscore=0 adultscore=0 phishscore=0 malwarescore=0 impostorscore=0 lowpriorityscore=0 clxscore=1011 spamscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.12.0-2009150000 definitions=main-2012120132 X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:195851 Archived-At: > I've now done this in Emacs 28, and I'm closing this bug report. There > was some talk about changing this warning in other ways, and if that's > something people want to pursue, opening a new bug report for that would > be fine. I can't tell just what was fixed and what might not have been, and the thread is too long to dig into now. If something was reported that hasn't yet been fixed, and you're aware of that, it would be great if you filed the bug report for that. It's good to keep a record of reports of outstanding problems, as well as to keep a record of suggested improvements. Thx.