From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Jim Porter Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#51993: 29.0.50; [PATCH] Killing emacsclient terminal with `server-stop-automatically' doesn't prompt to save files Date: Fri, 9 Sep 2022 11:04:36 -0700 Message-ID: References: <9e47c871-a2c3-d764-bec9-d87abf3efe83@gmail.com> <79a53ecc-dbfc-d088-d80d-96f349be794a@gmail.com> <834k7vw2vb.fsf@gnu.org> <87czc4tosz.fsf@gnus.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="32308"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: Eli Zaretskii , 51993@debbugs.gnu.org To: Lars Ingebrigtsen , Gregory Heytings Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Fri Sep 09 20:05:18 2022 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1oWiNS-000880-Ol for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Fri, 09 Sep 2022 20:05:18 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:46914 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1oWiNR-0003El-Lw for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Fri, 09 Sep 2022 14:05:17 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:49504) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1oWiNC-0003DT-SS for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 09 Sep 2022 14:05:02 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:46702) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1oWiNC-000409-Hj for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 09 Sep 2022 14:05:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1oWiNC-00023J-Bj for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 09 Sep 2022 14:05:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Jim Porter Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Fri, 09 Sep 2022 18:05:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 51993 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: patch Original-Received: via spool by 51993-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B51993.16627466877857 (code B ref 51993); Fri, 09 Sep 2022 18:05:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 51993) by debbugs.gnu.org; 9 Sep 2022 18:04:47 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:35401 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1oWiMw-00022e-P2 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 09 Sep 2022 14:04:46 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-pj1-f41.google.com ([209.85.216.41]:41520) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1oWiMs-00022K-DK for 51993@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 09 Sep 2022 14:04:45 -0400 Original-Received: by mail-pj1-f41.google.com with SMTP id q15-20020a17090a304f00b002002ac83485so2383920pjl.0 for <51993@debbugs.gnu.org>; Fri, 09 Sep 2022 11:04:42 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=content-transfer-encoding:content-language:in-reply-to:mime-version :date:message-id:from:references:cc:to:subject:from:to:cc:subject :date; bh=NglBviyyrPc8To6kukzaz3Mm2XZtUtAa1Y6/30+vnrA=; b=ouexjrg2N6CFNbqF90C0khS0BHYvcnlUHOgy5dHTaJQY323QL7IUrhKK0tZMkfcGMg DgepBp5TrbSfYlSp9egiUxtnGFOjTJTHWn724hK75APytPkSP6bdqcE7TsflhiUrrN/7 JAKoynVVI3ljfMQAHMBLXj07i6rFLKeMLrra7hh+WxI6/KneDBlsav0yeJxTsiUJO5sF D7K6lLu2xKbEGD+mfQzy5Wy105bg0f2KjBLq+DSys6yaHYutvP2Pwmcmn313+SToKWcs NDM/8jAIQwHjpyIzZYwLgE5Zeib0TyqAESJItQWX42PcdSqkhb+6obrahYEDMROaAs8i pq1g== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=content-transfer-encoding:content-language:in-reply-to:mime-version :date:message-id:from:references:cc:to:subject:x-gm-message-state :from:to:cc:subject:date; bh=NglBviyyrPc8To6kukzaz3Mm2XZtUtAa1Y6/30+vnrA=; b=NhGBpza8FoguneY+MK6nqtQDjQWVg/dJjL/MbWh/GruRYSu7eW/bt5XKltm0ujFN2C 6uYdkibBZpffMnMDbmAJiQgtXTTE5SbCZ0/KuTpvTFGkvne7y1UnVQr9zc8Eg6vl3rJS qNA8z8Iaj8uCM5JENKNIGzfz3YcYDZA4JuQT1EfPh0NjhldG0D4Nxp1u+JvbvuWWzmyf 5+UgRCoHOoTOQA3Yl9cqO0FU1m87sbw/6xZB1KdHhaVkAH8ui0Xj6I2jlbs1GoxZCzi4 NjyBRpX+GEfx8Z0r0fZYWx0IOxVny32RpDhdwcTkD+hNICeNzifUz5umazMco2oUa6TC Ds8g== X-Gm-Message-State: ACgBeo0Mwnt3hnBMJugs25tv6uhSdNBeQYAQ02O/ta+GFTe/ybX7rUga 1Q4Wt40tdQI9/kN4aICMNpTnXpgqstw= X-Google-Smtp-Source: AA6agR6y/7DYbyBipg6MCtse2HhMj1Okt1iIJWpUChYtHHs2eOPBey0NMR0q6C2Y9ExKR9oT0VkZ9A== X-Received: by 2002:a17:90a:1f49:b0:202:7a55:558f with SMTP id y9-20020a17090a1f4900b002027a55558fmr6971076pjy.108.1662746676518; Fri, 09 Sep 2022 11:04:36 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: from [192.168.1.2] (cpe-76-168-148-233.socal.res.rr.com. [76.168.148.233]) by smtp.googlemail.com with ESMTPSA id s8-20020a17090a880800b0020036e008bcsm764593pjn.4.2022.09.09.11.04.35 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Fri, 09 Sep 2022 11:04:35 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <87czc4tosz.fsf@gnus.org> Content-Language: en-US X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:242021 Archived-At: On 9/9/2022 10:55 AM, Lars Ingebrigtsen wrote: > Gregory Heytings writes: > >>> However, I'm not sure I understand the way forward, as you see >>> it. AFAIU, there are fundamental disagreements between you and >>> Gregory, and I don't think the disagreements are there because one >>> of you doesn't understand the proposals of the other. >>> >>> So how could these disagreements be reconciled? > >> I'm in the process of implementing something that should satisfy >> everyone, but it's not finished yet. > > This was half a year ago, and I'm not sure whether anything further was > done here? For what it's worth, I've been brainstorming some ideas for how to abstract things out a bit further to make it easy for users to tune the behavior just to their liking. I haven't gotten very far on that yet, though.