From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Glenn Morris Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#19657: 25.0.50; Test failures in Emacs master, can't figure out what I'm doing wrong Date: Thu, 22 Jan 2015 21:03:13 -0500 Message-ID: References: <87sif24p4c.fsf@loki.jorgenschaefer.de> <1i7fweuxpl.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> <54C19BC7.20707@yandex.ru> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1421978650 20494 80.91.229.3 (23 Jan 2015 02:04:10 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 23 Jan 2015 02:04:10 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Jorgen Schaefer , 19657@debbugs.gnu.org To: Dmitry Gutov Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Jan 23 03:04:09 2015 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1YETbV-0005i9-Aq for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Fri, 23 Jan 2015 03:04:09 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:56791 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YETbU-00077k-KV for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Thu, 22 Jan 2015 21:04:08 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:52040) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YETbO-00076x-TP for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 22 Jan 2015 21:04:03 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YETbO-00066W-5B for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 22 Jan 2015 21:04:02 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:34645) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YETbO-00066S-1q for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 22 Jan 2015 21:04:02 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1YETbN-0001wQ-N3 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 22 Jan 2015 21:04:01 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Glenn Morris Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Fri, 23 Jan 2015 02:04:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 19657 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 19657-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B19657.14219785967403 (code B ref 19657); Fri, 23 Jan 2015 02:04:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 19657) by debbugs.gnu.org; 23 Jan 2015 02:03:16 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:53337 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1YETae-0001vK-1a for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 22 Jan 2015 21:03:16 -0500 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([208.118.235.10]:42242 ident=Debian-exim) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1YETac-0001vD-RN for 19657@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 22 Jan 2015 21:03:15 -0500 Original-Received: from rgm by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YETab-0004Xn-Ll; Thu, 22 Jan 2015 21:03:13 -0500 X-Spook: Abbas world domination ANDVT Fortezza PET M-14 New World X-Ran: xqWS%wp%;.TgyVhm?lv@WwEq'E%WK#`tPu$BO%7Sux&y^cl?=cKzAnuu (Dmitry Gutov's message of "Fri, 23 Jan 2015 02:54:31 +0200") User-Agent: Gnus (www.gnus.org), GNU Emacs (www.gnu.org/software/emacs/) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 3.x X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:98612 Archived-At: Dmitry Gutov wrote: > That leaves only the regexp-opt test failure unresolved. I also think > it should just be preloaded in all builds. I agree. It's a small file. (Still kind of a shame that imagemagick needs it though.)