From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Gregory Heytings Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#56393: Actually fix the long lines display bug Date: Tue, 19 Jul 2022 21:40:36 +0000 Message-ID: References: <38c1a31040d2d2bc47ae@heytings.org> <83v8rvpxx7.fsf@gnu.org> <209e6aa436f84e1f729a@heytings.org> <83sfmzpw4e.fsf@gnu.org> <83h73epq7v.fsf@gnu.org> <83cze2pmtk.fsf@gnu.org> <838roqpkjs.fsf@gnu.org> <831quipdt2.fsf@gnu.org> <83r12intar.fsf@gnu.org> <83lespomnu.fsf@gnu.org> <83fsixnwh3.fsf@gnu.org> <834jzdnsxw.fsf@gnu.org> <83y1wpmciw.fsf@gnu.org> <83wnc9mbg4.fsf@gnu.org> <83o7xlm64k.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset=us-ascii Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="4242"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: gerd.moellmann@gmail.com, larsi@gnus.org, 56393@debbugs.gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Tue Jul 19 23:41:19 2022 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1oDuxz-0000tM-G0 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Tue, 19 Jul 2022 23:41:19 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:51176 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1oDuxx-0003qy-IR for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Tue, 19 Jul 2022 17:41:17 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:60302) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1oDuxj-0003qq-6l for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 19 Jul 2022 17:41:03 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:57598) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1oDuxi-0003VO-Ph for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 19 Jul 2022 17:41:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1oDuxi-0005FR-Ia for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 19 Jul 2022 17:41:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Gregory Heytings Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Tue, 19 Jul 2022 21:41:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 56393 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Original-Received: via spool by 56393-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B56393.165826684220137 (code B ref 56393); Tue, 19 Jul 2022 21:41:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 56393) by debbugs.gnu.org; 19 Jul 2022 21:40:42 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:55357 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1oDuxO-0005Ej-IR for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 19 Jul 2022 17:40:42 -0400 Original-Received: from heytings.org ([95.142.160.155]:44496) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1oDuxL-0005EX-1S for 56393@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 19 Jul 2022 17:40:41 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=heytings.org; s=20220101; t=1658266836; bh=xAHJfSMaqfLlrBADAE+LPPb50h7RSZ/2fRt86X/aJ58=; h=Date:From:To:cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:Message-ID:References:From; b=E3AnoA95lT64f03M2u1Gn4iQi8FmbobnK4//cWVz3a1tMSEtcEi/RkctaFR/s7E96 UlsAF1mMr4Gz97CTM9mBKa3ShbX0PeAB6sCKytAjRK37/2kY7vgo5aRIK4CGGXPokl VRoA6bvNNkPu1DQxmKCHI/u8wNzViX0C1/sxsEMzqjnPB2HKx9xZQY3eKqEApDtBmd kFkiTtNwQEBEe9FXj867ql1c10z5YphCwWr5GWZouy5Vuy/vo80Rjn9gi8p7ReSkRO vhagASZnnUpVbbbkJd3pJYanBufJQEd/ae3El4u9r4qG4E/WiS5RjzNMmBTZjqEOcN w1MGcCW9h4LMA== In-Reply-To: <83o7xlm64k.fsf@gnu.org> X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:237469 Archived-At: > > Would it help if the tick were incremented by the number of inserted (or > deleted or replaced) characters (perhaps limited by some reasonable > value, like 1000)? That would be an easy change, and I don't think it > would break anything, since no current code relies on the exact value of > the tick, and the value you get after some non-trivial operation on a > buffer is generally unpredictable anyway. Would that make the tick > usable for this task? > It would. In fact it is not even necessary to record the exact number of inserted/deleted/replaced characters. > > If you agree, I can make such a change (but feel free to do it > yourself). > I just did it, is this what you had in mind? The tick is incremented logarithmically.