From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Paul Eggert Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#30364: 26.0.91; thread crash on macos Date: Mon, 19 Feb 2018 09:24:32 -0800 Organization: UCLA Computer Science Department Message-ID: References: <871shj7k0n.fsf@gmail.com> <83k1vbbhvv.fsf@gnu.org> <83inavbg3p.fsf@gnu.org> <83eflic32p.fsf@gnu.org> <83zi469rge.fsf@gnu.org> <83vaeu9mtn.fsf@gnu.org> <83o9km9jr5.fsf@gnu.org> <83inau9hqa.fsf@gnu.org> <83eflhac8i.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1519061004 2227 195.159.176.226 (19 Feb 2018 17:23:24 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 19 Feb 2018 17:23:24 +0000 (UTC) User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.6.0 Cc: 30364@debbugs.gnu.org, alan@idiocy.org, npostavs@gmail.com, npostavs@users.sourceforge.net To: Eli Zaretskii , Aaron Jensen , Andreas Schwab Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Feb 19 18:23:19 2018 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1enp9f-0007x3-4c for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Mon, 19 Feb 2018 18:23:07 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:51538 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1enpBh-0006uA-0y for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Mon, 19 Feb 2018 12:25:13 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:57988) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1enpBY-0006sn-Pq for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 19 Feb 2018 12:25:05 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1enpBW-0005yU-3W for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 19 Feb 2018 12:25:04 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:43642) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1enpBV-0005yG-VM for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 19 Feb 2018 12:25:02 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1enpBV-0004wE-P4 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 19 Feb 2018 12:25:01 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Paul Eggert Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Mon, 19 Feb 2018 17:25:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 30364 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 30364-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B30364.151906108518958 (code B ref 30364); Mon, 19 Feb 2018 17:25:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 30364) by debbugs.gnu.org; 19 Feb 2018 17:24:45 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:51539 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1enpBF-0004vi-J7 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 19 Feb 2018 12:24:45 -0500 Original-Received: from zimbra.cs.ucla.edu ([131.179.128.68]:53600) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1enpBE-0004vV-6G for 30364@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 19 Feb 2018 12:24:44 -0500 Original-Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by zimbra.cs.ucla.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 457031615B2; Mon, 19 Feb 2018 09:24:38 -0800 (PST) Original-Received: from zimbra.cs.ucla.edu ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (zimbra.cs.ucla.edu [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10032) with ESMTP id KVFHaLxwFNJD; Mon, 19 Feb 2018 09:24:37 -0800 (PST) Original-Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by zimbra.cs.ucla.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8761E161610; Mon, 19 Feb 2018 09:24:37 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at zimbra.cs.ucla.edu Original-Received: from zimbra.cs.ucla.edu ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (zimbra.cs.ucla.edu [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10026) with ESMTP id Dcrd9NFIc2FB; Mon, 19 Feb 2018 09:24:37 -0800 (PST) Original-Received: from [192.168.1.9] (unknown [47.154.30.119]) by zimbra.cs.ucla.edu (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 5522E1615B2; Mon, 19 Feb 2018 09:24:37 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <83eflhac8i.fsf@gnu.org> Content-Language: en-US X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 208.118.235.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:143462 Archived-At: Eli Zaretskii wrote: >> Would you like me to vary it based on 32-bit vs 64-bit? > I think so, but I'd like to hear from others about this. Paul, > Andreas, could you please comment? A 64-bit Emacs should need more stack space than a 32-bit Emacs, yes. It=20 wouldn't be double the space, since not everything on the stack is a poin= ter or=20 an EMACS_INT. If you really want to fine-tune it you can also depend on t= he=20 width of EMACS_INT. Getting it "just right" would be a bit tricky. 8 MiB/thread for 64-bit Emacs sounds OK to me. I wouldn't cheap out on 64= -bit=20 platforms.