From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Gregory Heytings Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#60021: 29.0.60; Eshell completion errors in the presence of buffer redirects Date: Mon, 12 Dec 2022 23:34:20 +0000 Message-ID: References: <87pmconwnw.fsf@daniel-mendler.de> <17d95c0d-e0c5-b99d-c831-d9b815cbb25d@daniel-mendler.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="11382"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: arstoffel@gmail.com, 60021@debbugs.gnu.org To: Daniel Mendler Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Tue Dec 13 00:35:22 2022 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1p4sKP-0002l3-Me for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Tue, 13 Dec 2022 00:35:21 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1p4sK8-00056B-Hx; Mon, 12 Dec 2022 18:35:04 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1p4sK6-00055q-Qn for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 12 Dec 2022 18:35:02 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1p4sK6-0007Ij-6J for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 12 Dec 2022 18:35:02 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1p4sK5-0008Ib-O4 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 12 Dec 2022 18:35:01 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Gregory Heytings Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Mon, 12 Dec 2022 23:35:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 60021 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Original-Received: via spool by 60021-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B60021.167088806431881 (code B ref 60021); Mon, 12 Dec 2022 23:35:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 60021) by debbugs.gnu.org; 12 Dec 2022 23:34:24 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:56220 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1p4sJT-0008I9-Sr for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 12 Dec 2022 18:34:24 -0500 Original-Received: from heytings.org ([95.142.160.155]:55628) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1p4sJR-0008I3-S1 for 60021@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 12 Dec 2022 18:34:22 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=heytings.org; s=20220101; t=1670888061; bh=3puf1P/vvFoPmRnI7QE7bJkt5ht2QNkVG3917dfFYVI=; h=Date:From:To:cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:Message-ID:References:From; b=lL5ZiWg5cmG6m1Tn2uyVLsiVp3kYRJjUt07yzbcCHacfHKPxbNqsx46LJR3hj3Arh yKVlYUKHC//VsxKHwmaWO6zewm5ccpjQd6LzctE5JCu2Gj+IgatHqf3exnjsRKex76 EAtNqMr4/RU2meCorVHJ9+sNitlnMtz3T2fbL2i/Dff5ffnOwok8JcnglcXst6CJ4R Alh2SFxeACCx/RkR8L4hbrrvsl9Iv4ErVZf+Wgy68VH5UTZt4aC/ZCv/ATF0SYo5iH kvzqlv6iL8xf6WQOGbn4sEKaE7GQ50HvzKwuNW8AkwWFxk3kvhGNVCvZ+s73HSEkHb VzuokgWknWMtQ== In-Reply-To: <17d95c0d-e0c5-b99d-c831-d9b815cbb25d@daniel-mendler.de> X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:250776 Archived-At: >> Thanks for your bug report. Can you check that the attached patch >> fixes that bug, without introducing other obvious regressions? > > Yes, in my quick tests it fixes both issues. But I am not familiar with > the code in question. Hard to tell if it introduces other regressions. > Maybe Augusto (cc'ed) could also take a look please? > He already did, and although it fixes the two reported recipes, it's alas not a proper fix for that bug.