From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.ciao.gmane.io!not-for-mail From: Dmitry Gutov Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#37189: 25.4.1: vc-hg-ignore implementation is missing Date: Sat, 8 Feb 2020 12:57:04 +0300 Message-ID: References: <1ba53ae2-42a4-3ab3-d4f2-2ceae565d198@gmx.de> <52917e6f-2f00-25cf-4353-dfb40287d0ea@gmx.de> <83pnkrdpb3.fsf@gnu.org> <679942e8-abe9-b0fc-720d-75a54d8d0b5a@gmx.de> <95da41e8-7a55-a15c-cfa7-d70366f9ee6b@gmx.de> <412195c1-e196-12af-933b-0312f5075847@yandex.ru> <57825d73-27a4-d5f5-8198-a172796a558a@gmx.de> <1ebc6077-9175-65ba-4996-282bb2c8eca5@yandex.ru> <6145d6f6-37a8-7166-731b-57669086b145@gmx.de> <838slmk90j.fsf@gnu.org> <83h806gp2w.fsf@gnu.org> <8336bmg1o9.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="ciao.gmane.io:159.69.161.202"; logging-data="33817"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.9.0 Cc: 37189@debbugs.gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii , Wolfgang Scherer Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Sat Feb 08 10:58:11 2020 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1j0MsN-0008i5-GB for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Sat, 08 Feb 2020 10:58:11 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:39530 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1j0MsM-0006bp-Fl for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Sat, 08 Feb 2020 04:58:10 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:38266) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1j0MsF-0006bV-0I for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 08 Feb 2020 04:58:03 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1j0MsE-0008FR-3g for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 08 Feb 2020 04:58:02 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:44666) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1j0MsD-0008F0-W5 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 08 Feb 2020 04:58:02 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1j0MsD-00040j-VT for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 08 Feb 2020 04:58:01 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Dmitry Gutov Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sat, 08 Feb 2020 09:58:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 37189 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Original-Received: via spool by 37189-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B37189.158115583315364 (code B ref 37189); Sat, 08 Feb 2020 09:58:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 37189) by debbugs.gnu.org; 8 Feb 2020 09:57:13 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:50639 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1j0MrR-0003zk-EY for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 08 Feb 2020 04:57:13 -0500 Original-Received: from mail-lj1-f182.google.com ([209.85.208.182]:37114) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1j0MrQ-0003zX-82 for 37189@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 08 Feb 2020 04:57:12 -0500 Original-Received: by mail-lj1-f182.google.com with SMTP id v17so1912078ljg.4 for <37189@debbugs.gnu.org>; Sat, 08 Feb 2020 01:57:12 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=sender:subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id:date:user-agent :mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language:content-transfer-encoding; bh=bBrYgJwdpv6Gw9+Jsi8QsP04VMHCNRTObclTeAOL6yo=; b=AN7woO+a3nLTDZb+/LJxDaT3H5RTMUzhJoQsPIn4E7C5UYddX3ZOsAisyAB+zdxxYB 6OEAyNDQQFfpI+4jg8bBDhbOAYOM1BlMNjKzLSpbT2tE3vzMIpPFu3ZTCOBzH7hY15g2 PYJsuRgEmPf4wjLLzfSoapHsCWXceg+PZfqIyC6gN2qPsloVtUKEInqBU/0AsYZHXGjh apeHyGHFYZ1LitdQ4t4eCvBOZVmYy2+Sa9jE9Nxufkt124xRPc02yCuHBbhJ5+xwmM3D WZPdAoabWKXNAonUM4I5yegiS/cX58CQAVxKogD0PET7dAXDJyDLWVWyRqyXJ5uTNnXN PqjQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:sender:subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id :date:user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language :content-transfer-encoding; bh=bBrYgJwdpv6Gw9+Jsi8QsP04VMHCNRTObclTeAOL6yo=; b=DU/CjhZiNjGr+jowtNXM1O4XXUwvgs/JD0JWiqj98Mnc5l3MDIbD+9sXIDDtOc5v6R lMqPv0/4ug8/d0HINPK/IKDGPD2m6bBeLyfNCA2qPICHkaP4ZMKfj/Dl9pOc0OGUjfJ4 VGX+0J19DOu78lUf2/i7o7cyceTvHV30oR2fblotwDa2P/36P6N9NDgk3J1G/JMf53lA r+VEsr6MqjC5ZkNlkkngwyabkmqjzQ3Gtl6Td5Ml0pca790UrON/WBxgomLC8giGOGnz 03PiR8jjeK/5t/zcrDtBpTMRM0bdbExPIjolJtIJKUa0uY+OOL0nZ/IMPJDPQUAyiaoI ZV/w== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAW3n3LbRtuEPGSR/Loxyk7uZL6PjZvoOoNi66mf2qhvPI0wmyYe qkUhLN6nesPHTvwpYOSuY0NUZMtkIjs= X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqziCUfdJX6kC5Mj/D5QeULNAvHZ0eR8hYdvnjpYynRX8l6paCyBbwgEpkYNm9sUaDQmrWhsHw== X-Received: by 2002:a05:651c:111a:: with SMTP id d26mr2266170ljo.153.1581155825884; Sat, 08 Feb 2020 01:57:05 -0800 (PST) Original-Received: from [192.168.1.142] ([178.252.127.239]) by smtp.googlemail.com with ESMTPSA id 144sm2376565lfi.67.2020.02.08.01.57.04 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Sat, 08 Feb 2020 01:57:05 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <8336bmg1o9.fsf@gnu.org> Content-Language: en-US X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 209.51.188.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:175784 Archived-At: On 07.02.2020 12:57, Eli Zaretskii wrote: > AFAIU, Dmitry oversees the VC development and maintenance. That > includes the issues you raised here. That's right. And I asked some questions before in this report and didn't get direct answers. To be clear, I'm quite happy with the meat of the patch presented here, just suspicious of the not well-enough documented change in vc-ignore's semantics. So yeah, we need a better understanding of the problem and maybe a better design. Hopefully one that's not too different from the current one. I'll read the whole of the discussion as soon as I can, but it's going to take some time to digest, sorry. > It's up to Dmitry, really. If he feels my attempt to understand the > design critique you present is not helping, then I'll gladly leave it > to him to continue with this report. Quite the opposite. If you reach some mutual understanding, it will surely help me when reading this thread a bit later.