From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: henri-biard@francemel.fr Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#49039: Aspell in Emacs Date: Tue, 15 Jun 2021 20:09:44 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_001_60c8ece8_502f_684af946" Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="5759"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: 49039@debbugs.gnu.org To: "Eli Zaretskii" Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Tue Jun 15 20:10:16 2021 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1ltDVu-0001Iu-3c for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Tue, 15 Jun 2021 20:10:14 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:44040 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1ltDVt-0002gX-4X for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Tue, 15 Jun 2021 14:10:13 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:53220) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1ltDVi-0002gJ-PB for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 15 Jun 2021 14:10:02 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:39178) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1ltDVi-0004jZ-Gb for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 15 Jun 2021 14:10:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1ltDVi-0005N3-1U for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 15 Jun 2021 14:10:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: henri-biard@francemel.fr Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Tue, 15 Jun 2021 18:10:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 49039 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: notabug Original-Received: via spool by 49039-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B49039.162378059720629 (code B ref 49039); Tue, 15 Jun 2021 18:10:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 49039) by debbugs.gnu.org; 15 Jun 2021 18:09:57 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:50724 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1ltDVd-0005Mf-1k for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 15 Jun 2021 14:09:57 -0400 Original-Received: from msg-1.mailo.com ([213.182.54.11]:36394) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1ltDVb-0005MR-8T for 49039@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 15 Jun 2021 14:09:55 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=francemel.fr; s=mailo; t=1623780584; bh=Y66Nfb/RPkxeuqFjd6+WfoZayxltfGr2mFw1qLE5uKc=; h=X-EA-Auth:From:To:Cc:Date:Subject:MIME-Version:X-Mailer: Message-ID:In-Reply-To:Content-Type; b=IXo/pJMLY+Na8w36Ux/yPoDagsDF0Vt3bY1uISrbZAoYBNBw8nQHA5kXksseQEtIK EuW2yvooxbhvurwfYXPkPyZ/L0bd16YoSTjykIC+LAbE13bqzfB3C2REA05JeEobcv re6Y48OEuBfFpM8N7TtUbu+madtTMSf5XOC3kIUA= Original-Received: by www-7.mailo.com with http webmail; Tue, 15 Jun 2021 20:09:44 +0200 (CEST) X-EA-Auth: rO/nS8FKZhxsrDdiIR//s5ULCeusoCIUZqiKqLsBaneUEVfVqOnNkPDcL5FBl5iIOa8xlEhcorORKaif3fKANtB7txlJjd7K X-Priority: 3 X-Mailer: COMS/EA21.01/r20210601 In-Reply-To: <83y2bb2f03.fsf@gnu.org> X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:208587 Archived-At: ------=_NextPart_001_60c8ece8_502f_684af946 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Agreed, it was mainly a confusion thing.=C2=A0 Hoped that Emacs would be cl= earer on what it was actually doing.=C2=A0 Many times historic things get i= n the way.=C2=A0 As things move forward, historic things should be gradually moved to the side and concentrate on the realit= ies of today.=C2=A0 It is a wise comment but not something I can force.=C2=A0 But it is important to unders= tand this. From: Eli Zaretskii To: henri-biard@francemel.fr Subject: bug#49039: Aspell in Emacs Date: 15/06/2021 19:51:08 Europe/Paris Cc: 49039@debbugs.gnu.org > Date: Tue, 15 Jun 2021 20:30:08 +0300 > From: Eli Zaretskii > Cc: 49039@debbugs.gnu.org >=20 > In any case, since Emacs already looks for known spell-checkers, and > already prefers aspell, my conclusion from the fact that it didn't > work for you is that you have some unusual setup, which should be > quite rare nowadays. The defaults are set such that the user will not > need to know about this variable. Actually, it's more likely that everything worked as intended on your system, i.e. Emacs uses aspell for spell-checking commands, and you simply _thought_ it didn't work because you expected to find commands like aspell-word. ------=_NextPart_001_60c8ece8_502f_684af946 Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Agreed, it was mainly a confusion thing.=C2=A0 Hoped that Emacs would = be clearer on what it was actually doing.=C2=A0 Many times historic things = get in the way.=C2=A0 As things move forward, historic
things sho= uld be gradually moved to the side and concentrate on the realities of toda= y.=C2=A0 It is a wise
comment but not something I can force.=C2= =A0 But it is important to understand this.


From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
To: henri-biard@francemel.fr
Subject: bug#49039: Aspell in Emacs
Date: 15/06/2021 19:51:08 Europe/Paris
Cc: 49039@debbugs.gnu.org

> Date: Tue, 15 Jun 2021 20:30:08 +0300
> From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
> Cc: 49039@debbugs.gnu.org
>
> In any case, since Emacs already looks for known spell-checkers, and<= br> > already prefers aspell, my conclusion from the fact that it didn't > work for you is that you have some unusual setup, which should be
= > quite rare nowadays. The defaults are set such that the user will no= t
> need to know about this variable.

Actually, it's more likely that everything worked as intended on your
system, i.e. Emacs uses aspell for spell-checking commands, and you
simply _thought_ it didn't work because you expected to find commands
like aspell-word.



------=_NextPart_001_60c8ece8_502f_684af946--