Politely ??? He closed and continued with >I didn't read the rest of the bug report -- you previously said (under a >different name) that you were a "journalist" performing some sort of >"experiment". If the experiment is to test how many irrelevant bug >reports you can file before getting banned (or something similar) -- >please stop the experiment. Can see how it is extremely polite !  Full of accusations about user's ill will. Things do not become pleasant because one adds please at the end. >You'd prefer we left bugs that are not bugs open? No, but people need time to respond and get some clarifications.  We all understand that a bug report gets closed.  Have worked in many places where bug reports just need some clarification. Where can one report on fixes (things one could technically argue are not fundamentally bugs) or to discuss improvements ? You contributed to the conversation >(hmm, flyspell mode binds "C-." and "C-,", which donʼt work on >tty. Perhaps we should invent alternate bindings, but thatʼs a >separate bugreport) This has nothing to do with the bug report, but I get the lynching, and you don't. From: Robert Pluim To: henri-biard@francemel.fr Subject: bug#49037: flyspell word correction frustrating Date: 15/06/2021 17:55:04 Europe/Paris Cc: Lars Ingebrigtsen ;    49037@debbugs.gnu.org >>>>> On Tue, 15 Jun 2021 17:23:52 +0200 (CEST), henri-biard@francemel.fr said: henri-biard> One developer full of shit trying to maintain a package whilst closing henri-biard> bug reports he doesn't like. Now the banning bullshit starts.  You reported a bug that was not a bug. Lars closed it, rapidly. And politely, unlike you. henri-biard> You might as well ban people considering you are getting in the habit to close request henri-biard> anyway. You'd prefer we left bugs that are not bugs open? (hmm, flyspell mode binds "C-." and "C-,", which donʼt work on tty. Perhaps we should invent alternate bindings, but thatʼs a separate bugreport) Robert --