From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Drew Adams Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#18367: 24.4.50; [PATCH] Text property `font-lock-ignore', to protect from font-lock Date: Sun, 31 Aug 2014 13:56:29 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: References: <86f1a219-9ab5-439f-85ca-936b942cb034@default> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1409518655 14365 80.91.229.3 (31 Aug 2014 20:57:35 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 31 Aug 2014 20:57:35 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 18367@debbugs.gnu.org To: Stefan Monnier Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun Aug 31 22:57:24 2014 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1XOCBf-0006g5-Dl for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sun, 31 Aug 2014 22:57:23 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:51035 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XOCBf-0002mL-58 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sun, 31 Aug 2014 16:57:23 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:59343) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XOCBT-0002lN-Gw for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 31 Aug 2014 16:57:20 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XOCBK-0002AH-Oc for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 31 Aug 2014 16:57:11 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:35362) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XOCBK-0002AD-La for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 31 Aug 2014 16:57:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1XOCBK-0007xQ-9H for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 31 Aug 2014 16:57:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Drew Adams Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sun, 31 Aug 2014 20:57:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 18367 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 18367-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B18367.140951860230563 (code B ref 18367); Sun, 31 Aug 2014 20:57:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 18367) by debbugs.gnu.org; 31 Aug 2014 20:56:42 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:55159 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1XOCAz-0007wr-Qu for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 31 Aug 2014 16:56:42 -0400 Original-Received: from aserp1040.oracle.com ([141.146.126.69]:22159) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1XOCAw-0007wZ-49 for 18367@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 31 Aug 2014 16:56:38 -0400 Original-Received: from ucsinet22.oracle.com (ucsinet22.oracle.com [156.151.31.94]) by aserp1040.oracle.com (Sentrion-MTA-4.3.2/Sentrion-MTA-4.3.2) with ESMTP id s7VKuUwi007572 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK); Sun, 31 Aug 2014 20:56:31 GMT Original-Received: from userz7021.oracle.com (userz7021.oracle.com [156.151.31.85]) by ucsinet22.oracle.com (8.14.5+Sun/8.14.5) with ESMTP id s7VKuS76027553 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL); Sun, 31 Aug 2014 20:56:30 GMT Original-Received: from abhmp0014.oracle.com (abhmp0014.oracle.com [141.146.116.20]) by userz7021.oracle.com (8.14.4+Sun/8.14.4) with ESMTP id s7VKuSEZ009319; Sun, 31 Aug 2014 20:56:28 GMT In-Reply-To: X-Priority: 3 X-Mailer: Oracle Beehive Extensions for Outlook 2.0.1.8.2 (807160) [OL 12.0.6691.5000 (x86)] X-Source-IP: ucsinet22.oracle.com [156.151.31.94] X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 3.x X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:92902 Archived-At: > >> Could you add a short explanation for why font-lock-face is > >> not sufficient? > > > > Sorry, but I don't know why it might be imagined sufficient. >=20 > Can you please just answer the damn question? Can you please control your nastiness? I answered your "damn" question to the best of my ability, trying to guess what you mean by it. I do not claim to be an expert on `font-lock-face', and I did not mention it in my bug report. I have no idea why you think `font-lock-face' is sufficient for the feature I requested - how (you think) it provides it. I'm not a mind reader. I listed several ways in which (I think) `font-lock-face' is unrelated to the feature and does not provide it. Apparently that is not enough for you. In that case, please say how you see `font-lock-face' as being sufficient to provide the feature. What, in your eyes, is the relation between `font-lock-face' and the requested feature? If you do that then I will hopefully understand what you have in mind, and I will hopefully be able to show why I think you are wrong (i.e., show why `font-lock-face' is not sufficient), in the terms you will have expressed. Or perhaps then I will agree with you that `font-lock-face' is sufficient to realize the feature. But without your saying anything about what you mean, I cannot speak more to your vague (and now nasty) inquiry. So far, nothing from you - only heat, no light.