From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Dmitry Gutov Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#34343: [PATCH] Make project--find-regexp-in-files work with remote files Date: Sun, 29 Dec 2019 16:14:01 +0300 Message-ID: References: <9d65284f-7a64-5e9c-ab02-fbbd1be41689@yandex.ru> <87r2bt1tio.fsf@gmx.de> <2cfd53b2-8202-a321-a853-da0c949b0f15@yandex.ru> <6cf8bfa8-3873-d3db-9139-854359027e8a@yandex.ru> <87h81mqiq5.fsf@gmx.de> <0ff03b20-20d8-b6c0-c876-3fd525586180@yandex.ru> <87mubdps6s.fsf@gmx.de> <87blrsz3tf.fsf@gmx.de> <87blrrmht9.fsf@gmx.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Injection-Info: blaine.gmane.org; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:195.159.176.226"; logging-data="192639"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@blaine.gmane.org" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.9.0 Cc: =?UTF-8?Q?Felici=C3=A1n_?= =?UTF-8?Q?N=C3=A9meth?= , 34343@debbugs.gnu.org To: Michael Albinus Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun Dec 29 14:15:16 2019 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1ilYPc-000nzc-5p for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sun, 29 Dec 2019 14:15:16 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:51700 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1ilYPa-0004Fg-Oi for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sun, 29 Dec 2019 08:15:14 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:54206) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1ilYPP-0004F9-VR for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 29 Dec 2019 08:15:05 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ilYPO-0004Zz-RU for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 29 Dec 2019 08:15:03 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:53381) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ilYPO-0004Ye-K8 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 29 Dec 2019 08:15:02 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1ilYPO-0003Jw-FP for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 29 Dec 2019 08:15:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Dmitry Gutov Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sun, 29 Dec 2019 13:15:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 34343 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: patch Original-Received: via spool by 34343-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B34343.157762525212693 (code B ref 34343); Sun, 29 Dec 2019 13:15:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 34343) by debbugs.gnu.org; 29 Dec 2019 13:14:12 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:59354 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1ilYOa-0003If-74 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 29 Dec 2019 08:14:12 -0500 Original-Received: from mail-lf1-f50.google.com ([209.85.167.50]:45701) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1ilYOX-0003IQ-CU for 34343@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 29 Dec 2019 08:14:11 -0500 Original-Received: by mail-lf1-f50.google.com with SMTP id 203so23602775lfa.12 for <34343@debbugs.gnu.org>; Sun, 29 Dec 2019 05:14:09 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=sender:subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id:date:user-agent :mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language:content-transfer-encoding; bh=rlQScU8MPuFx3taqw0LapLsq/WL8QKUh3sUuHynYckc=; b=afPoPqUNI31UOu5qSy/VAiP28CUXvqLvAjx9GS/Yq3CN/JvHSUeZbyw3LfFfwizEjt DKZyJysovPEDopcY4zYESop2oX3kjJdjLvyfHNrMbUGe6BaoypQvXoFhKM5UaVlqHckG tjvRoDaQL6qsgGSaSoYMVfKzbVLgbx63WRsS4F0gP61PQqLeZKirU/jPnDiiTkSx4c3s jLtKSwpSEJFJWT3x6j7AqMYoNLxvl0PMj/nfco2jFlrP4TJ6bX5Q74F3jbn929/fuoeH AU+NKiJuvyQXWp30gKAe/oWdXQ8Wug+2CcnL9GarDMsAV6sPHs3Te2HzlXArRrmsh/xV 1I6w== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:sender:subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id :date:user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language :content-transfer-encoding; bh=rlQScU8MPuFx3taqw0LapLsq/WL8QKUh3sUuHynYckc=; b=B8+dNi/RJBIfKscEEt7rrgPv/zqsehUHcExBzH8lJOzR/HoYgkuL4cnknlvUP/FGQ4 /RV0C00l7SYs6Uk1apDoHbvsJhk97mq7PDYIYpz6yiDamdXKC77Wy/DZBvtrpuPvAtti e7LuVu5DIJLggVOL1hV17coJDhAu4s9KqNH9QckcXBFRisBEegpWIPKy4w02k/xcTLLj 3KxhRSykCV2aEoHYohoUfIdkg/SsdxcMpCkvRSF39bb72WiBhrFD61z/KIa20b2vpG9W IfTHLNx7W+EBZMZN7FSlYu3NYfGlY7VSlR7k+GvO0rsB5iCTIcjyTJ4SUkSAX6Gy0BbE OMLw== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAXJveU3HYJyeVmkcaQjp6UPKdChgb5WEZXiLt4iVluJmjFMTlz9 y5SgliWATohw6zzF0RFe58xHFHg62zs= X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqxToY800L/NIrQ8aHGu92RV1Z+m1hwY9wlSVXlBrTC17MZSG9ieJ6lrkQaPUYv9p7VOqDB7mQ== X-Received: by 2002:a19:40d3:: with SMTP id n202mr19365326lfa.108.1577625243036; Sun, 29 Dec 2019 05:14:03 -0800 (PST) Original-Received: from [192.168.1.142] ([178.252.127.239]) by smtp.googlemail.com with ESMTPSA id y1sm13735385ljm.12.2019.12.29.05.14.01 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Sun, 29 Dec 2019 05:14:02 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <87blrrmht9.fsf@gmx.de> Content-Language: en-US X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 209.51.188.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:173879 Archived-At: On 29.12.2019 14:34, Michael Albinus wrote: > Not always. But even if it calls expand-file-name, this doesn't mean > always that a remote command is fired. This is what is expensive. That depends on our performance goals. As described in https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=34343#29, when called on a lot of files, it can be fairly expensive even when offline. But eliminating remote calls will be a win, for sure.