From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Dmitry Gutov Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#20637: incompatible, undocumented change to vc-working-revision Date: Wed, 13 Apr 2016 23:55:37 +0300 Message-ID: References: <6ok2vyzwf9.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> <08f70cda-44be-0657-e50a-2b2c80d2c21c@yandex.ru> <87mvphnoei.fsf@gmx.de> <874mbawp84.fsf@gmx.de> <878u0llwq6.fsf@gmx.de> <0455367c-8ece-3520-a79e-6b08110e8108@yandex.ru> <87potxwd1u.fsf@gmx.de> <87egacws5x.fsf@gmx.de> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1460580983 24069 80.91.229.3 (13 Apr 2016 20:56:23 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 13 Apr 2016 20:56:23 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 20637@debbugs.gnu.org To: Michael Albinus Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Apr 13 22:56:13 2016 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1aqRpd-0006AO-0Q for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Wed, 13 Apr 2016 22:56:13 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:52028 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aqRpc-0000eC-K7 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Wed, 13 Apr 2016 16:56:12 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:38472) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aqRpV-0000W1-Fj for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 13 Apr 2016 16:56:09 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aqRpS-0005d3-97 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 13 Apr 2016 16:56:05 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:49958) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aqRpS-0005cy-2n for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 13 Apr 2016 16:56:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1aqRpR-0005Ts-US for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 13 Apr 2016 16:56:01 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Dmitry Gutov Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Wed, 13 Apr 2016 20:56:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 20637 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 20637-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B20637.146058094621044 (code B ref 20637); Wed, 13 Apr 2016 20:56:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 20637) by debbugs.gnu.org; 13 Apr 2016 20:55:46 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:34062 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1aqRpC-0005TL-EL for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 13 Apr 2016 16:55:46 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-wm0-f53.google.com ([74.125.82.53]:34998) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1aqRpA-0005T6-VA for 20637@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 13 Apr 2016 16:55:45 -0400 Original-Received: by mail-wm0-f53.google.com with SMTP id a140so120431354wma.0 for <20637@debbugs.gnu.org>; Wed, 13 Apr 2016 13:55:44 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=sender:subject:to:references:cc:from:message-id:date:user-agent :mime-version:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=ymdQ0ubZcsn6VqzeaCOUpP9+TCBehdoQANXvN3TRvac=; b=yFF4CF6c9oIWTaE9cfb97gWFiwQAGZiuXI7D0IPQ6RCHnEuTsf3gX0lzxTb9sqt+26 aeNB71Fu5jFeQEwrUUuQyvE0kuxWzM4tMG+g8dRIqDI4tZ3L/WNoKKlKCKkMl4LizUiC 3vRc/4zwWzUq6tdknKDMYXwSJTRQgFoTMtIpIImurbUX8SVZkDu5RBsO3//ZOWK7MALA 61a8KD1ROonlMNXajiXat2u6Pd9BudAzhJCK8mrZng/ob0XNr8Fcve50l+tV+gC9yQ9C WohvMPhGJpSBawq5T5yZc722RozVmfTn81KykhWmz3A1bDjNhXoEEjXna5nb0b3wXUN3 1Swg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:sender:subject:to:references:cc:from:message-id :date:user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=ymdQ0ubZcsn6VqzeaCOUpP9+TCBehdoQANXvN3TRvac=; b=OPrYqMieo+XX1PuhK4hTOd8/Pyj8MPxWVcmgC2dlfdgaxixzBV1rkiRStvRUW6kIUH soXUv3hX3phPuGoRfBMF1Kt3vDIoIzgdVgOG6bbVB1oW31Ndd2vwZoVOI3690nas06Td MwEVU2nx7dLVcnwq7caDxpj07Em9L5ouslwTeNgrngiFqwIp1sYZTMss0fLhMjjtw+Qo IW3CdI17MyNzPUUIvzhoWJX2bHvIdToYseSwB8rlw37wa6J8N9tnFhokrV15Za5hjnni mOUrHUibh6FqGfZWf2VfvIUx1fCkMQCTzWUjrW0V4rRhhh8R9vpZD4WaQ9G5iIGgKgNB fkHQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AOPr4FX4Iw1lF/zvrUYG9sCb8knuAE/itL0JqNASOoYzBJ/yYbppMbTOMf9PeT52PpOasQ== X-Received: by 10.28.144.20 with SMTP id s20mr13072199wmd.12.1460580939407; Wed, 13 Apr 2016 13:55:39 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: from [192.168.1.2] ([185.105.175.24]) by smtp.googlemail.com with ESMTPSA id x2sm40410364wjr.33.2016.04.13.13.55.38 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Wed, 13 Apr 2016 13:55:38 -0700 (PDT) User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.0 In-Reply-To: <87egacws5x.fsf@gmx.de> X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 208.118.235.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:116446 Archived-At: On 04/11/2016 09:55 AM, Michael Albinus wrote: >>> But nobody has taken any action for more than 10 months :-( >> >> I would expect that to be the responsibility of the person who caused >> the breakage. > > Of course! > > Until now I even didn't realize this was broken by my patch. Sorry, but > I have been in hospital last year, and when I recovered there were too > many messages to scan. To be clear, I don't mean to blame you for the time that has passed. But you were probably the best person to notice this regression, and understand why it happened, early enough. Personally, I've looked at this bug report before, and could only tell that the documentation needed updating (but the changed behavior is fine). That's not my impression anymore. Thanks.