From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Gregory Heytings Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#61667: 29.0.60; Failure to redisplay Date: Wed, 22 Feb 2023 16:29:09 +0000 Message-ID: References: <04d7cb31-684c-07c0-ee7b-503514fc1a85@yandex.ru> <87a617eanz.fsf@yahoo.com> <4306cb76-a44c-3101-e43c-fd64afae4a51@yandex.ru> <871qmje2ws.fsf@yahoo.com> <83edqjtbss.fsf@gnu.org> <4e5e2a46-9b07-206a-6774-9f98f34cbd14@yandex.ru> <83y1orrolh.fsf@gnu.org> <83sfeyswdw.fsf@gnu.org> <877cwactgv.fsf@yahoo.com> <83mt55sxli.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="14031"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: Po Lu , 61667@debbugs.gnu.org, Eli Zaretskii To: Dmitry Gutov Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Wed Feb 22 17:30:11 2023 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1pUs0R-0003Ra-6J for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Wed, 22 Feb 2023 17:30:11 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1pUs0L-0006H8-8n; Wed, 22 Feb 2023 11:30:05 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1pUs0J-0006GN-19 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 22 Feb 2023 11:30:03 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1pUs0I-00060d-Nt for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 22 Feb 2023 11:30:02 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1pUs0I-0007m2-Jb for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 22 Feb 2023 11:30:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Gregory Heytings Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Wed, 22 Feb 2023 16:30:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 61667 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Original-Received: via spool by 61667-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B61667.167708335329780 (code B ref 61667); Wed, 22 Feb 2023 16:30:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 61667) by debbugs.gnu.org; 22 Feb 2023 16:29:13 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:60190 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1pUrzV-0007kF-9k for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 22 Feb 2023 11:29:13 -0500 Original-Received: from heytings.org ([95.142.160.155]:40170) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1pUrzT-0007k2-Gr for 61667@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 22 Feb 2023 11:29:11 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=heytings.org; s=20220101; t=1677083350; bh=7eVibDph5OfiS2gppnA8Xd2caFUQiCfXdT+jeUhB83I=; h=Date:From:To:cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:Message-ID:References:From; b=5GyKkT0fjmzpAE1CSgRgAYGf/skIHqIoXl+QPCl6o3P1Wvbg5q9oMage+KSVzOw9p OJZQnnXAqQb7o+5XVkDbvZczKIoBe2e+rjthhq36UW0ehKNvqHfa8YSB8Bj4f+4j/G y3VQWN2+0kQIgBTTtyg3tbGsxdj/DPQrtOOkcaNtLQl3BmjTF/L0D6aIxCPqgu1skf YqKhFObfH1JUYiotuK/bRhjyqWyBgdNOwYx2HPT61+E0WyxFCa26kWTNnORD7uBlqx fmCu27y8e4g7nnxNnbqr9lk5fthOudYSxPJXmSlUprB4qrus7uc1x9BGqkaVPx7+G/ EnihK7P8YHE2w== In-Reply-To: X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:256374 Archived-At: > > Indeed, I haven't managed to reproduce the problem even once when the > printing patch is applied. > You said the bug appeared a month ago or so, maybe you could try to bisect?