bug#51459: 29.0.50; org-return and org-return-and-maybe-indent

["Andreas Röhler" <andreas.roehler@easy-emacs.de>]

On 28.10.21 15:40, Kévin Le Gouguec wrote:
> Andreas Röhler <andreas.roehler@easy-emacs.de> writes:
>
>> When in init-file
>>
>> (add-hook 'org-mode-hook (lambda () (electric-indent-mode -1)))
>> (setq org-adapt-indentation t)
>>
>> C-j would indent.
>>
>> However, IMO doesn't make sense to require these extra config in order
>> to get a reasonable behavior.
> And everything hinges on what one finds "reasonable".
>
> As discussed in bug#51167, in the wake of electric-indent-mode being
> honored in Org 9.4, plenty of people have come to emacs-orgmode to
> express that they did not expect RET to indent.  Thus Org maintainers
> chose to change the default value of org-adapt-indentation for Org 9.5.
>
> Note that by default (electric-indent-mode t, org-adapt-indentation nil)
> RET *does* indent in some specific scenarios, e.g. "- list item RET"
> will indent (resp. with electric-indent-mode nil, "- list item C-j"),
> because Org assumes that you want to add a paragraph to your list item.
>
> To recap:
>
> - electric-indent-mode is enabled by default in Org, as it is globally
>    in Emacs: hence RET indents, C-j does not.
>
> - org-adapt-indentation tells Org whether you want your documents to be
>    hard-indented or not: starting with 9.5, they won't be by default.

Censored as bug was making RET und C-j behave likewise, i.e. not 
indenting either.


>> When calling C-u RET, get "org--newline: Wrong type argument:
>> number-or-marker-p, (4)"
> That does look like a bug, however.