From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Daniel Mendler Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#53053: 28.0.90; Tramp completion bug of path /sudo::~/ Date: Fri, 4 Feb 2022 01:11:56 +0100 Message-ID: References: <58e88707-e8e1-604d-945a-4a1e234b86a5@daniel-mendler.de> <87sftz8wul.fsf@gmx.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="25899"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: Stefan Monnier , 53053@debbugs.gnu.org To: Michael Albinus Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Fri Feb 04 01:13:14 2022 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1nFmDx-0006WU-NK for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Fri, 04 Feb 2022 01:13:13 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:39466 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1nFmDw-0003HC-6V for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Thu, 03 Feb 2022 19:13:12 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:34734) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1nFmDm-0003FE-UN for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 03 Feb 2022 19:13:04 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:36146) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1nFmDm-0000DQ-Ko for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 03 Feb 2022 19:13:02 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1nFmDm-0008DA-Eg for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 03 Feb 2022 19:13:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Daniel Mendler Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Fri, 04 Feb 2022 00:13:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 53053 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Original-Received: via spool by 53053-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B53053.164393353231494 (code B ref 53053); Fri, 04 Feb 2022 00:13:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 53053) by debbugs.gnu.org; 4 Feb 2022 00:12:12 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:58276 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1nFmCx-0008Bt-PU for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 03 Feb 2022 19:12:11 -0500 Original-Received: from server.qxqx.de ([178.63.65.180]:40511 helo=mail.qxqx.de) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1nFmCr-0008BH-PJ for 53053@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 03 Feb 2022 19:12:10 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=qxqx.de; s=mail1392553390; h=Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:In-Reply-To:From: References:Cc:To:Subject:MIME-Version:Date:Message-ID:Sender:Reply-To: Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender: Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=82Q8Kp8/IQV6LM7p8Zj003UDOKoJJzpa8ojifPNWH9I=; b=EI94bojsmiZK0HN19lpY9Ipeb5 z+tJ6RlxnMdl0tNLqOPXFDh9BgiiK6tY8vMxNCSbACM93l0drQFfVju97tVWCHwavaiUJt+7JVkZK xuAiRpMxoe5qPrwNxqm1dlGoeFBVD7eMDdKo2lVpYaFdzm0RKaKU3yLQEWx+mj7fbLoE=; Content-Language: en-US In-Reply-To: <87sftz8wul.fsf@gmx.de> X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:225943 Archived-At: Hi Michael, thank you for your response! The issue came up again in https://github.com/minad/vertico/issues/193. The issue is that the completion boundaries are reported incorrectly by the file completion table or the Tramp backend. For example both (completion-boundaries "/sudo::~/" #'read-file-name-internal nil "") (completion-boundaries "/sudo::/" #'read-file-name-internal nil "") incorrectly return (8 . 0) as boundaries. These values are reported by the 'boundaries action of the completion table. I am not sure if the bug is on the layer of Tramp or on a level above. I cc'ed Stefan, he probably knows the precise location. Daniel