bug#13266: 24.3.50; no doc for `line-move'

bug#13266: 24.3.50; no doc for `line-move'

[Drew Adams]

C-h v line-move-visual
 
This _user option_ is explained in terms of `line-move'.  You cannot
understand this without understanding what `line-move' does.
 
But there is no doc for `line-move'.  Please add a doc string for it.
 
And why not document it in the Elisp manual?  `line-move-ignore-visible'
is documented there.  And `forward-line' is documented there.  Why be so
skimpy wrt informing users about `line-move', on which visual line mode
and other things are based?

In GNU Emacs 24.3.50.1 (i386-mingw-nt5.1.2600)
 of 2012-12-18 on MS-W7-DANI
Bzr revision: 111265 eliz@gnu.org-20121218190556-x9wmq083vwecgu0f
Windowing system distributor `Microsoft Corp.', version 5.1.2600
Configured using:
 `configure --with-gcc (4.7) --no-opt --enable-checking --cflags
 -Ic:/emacs/libs/libXpm-3.5.10/include -Ic:/emacs/libs/libXpm-3.5.10/src
 -Ic:/emacs/libs/libpng-dev_1.4.3-1_win32/include
 -Ic:/emacs/libs/zlib-dev_1.2.5-2_win32/include
 -Ic:/emacs/libs/giflib-4.1.4-1-lib/include
 -Ic:/emacs/libs/jpeg-6b-4-lib/include
 -Ic:/emacs/libs/tiff-3.8.2-1-lib/include
 -Ic:/emacs/libs/libxml2-2.7.8-w32-bin/include/libxml2
 -Ic:/emacs/libs/gnutls-3.0.9-w32-bin/include
 -Ic:/emacs/libs/libiconv-1.9.2-1-lib/include'
 

bug#13266: 24.3.50; no doc for `line-move'

[Lars Ingebrigtsen]

"Drew Adams" <drew.adams@oracle.com> writes:

> C-h v line-move-visual
>
> This _user option_ is explained in terms of `line-move'.  You cannot
> understand this without understanding what `line-move' does.
>
> But there is no doc for `line-move'.  Please add a doc string for it.

This was fixed earlier.

-- 
(domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.)
  bloggy blog http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no/

bug#13266: 24.3.50; no doc for `line-move'

[Drew Adams]

> > C-h v line-move-visual
> >
> > This _user option_ is explained in terms of `line-move'.  You
> > cannot understand this without understanding what `line-move' does.
> >
> > But there is no doc for `line-move'.  Please add a doc string for
> > it.
> 
> This was fixed earlier.

Yes, it was apparently fixed within the last 2 days.  Thx.