From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.ciao.gmane.io!not-for-mail From: Dmitry Gutov Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#40990: Improve message-mode and isearch icons Date: Fri, 1 May 2020 18:21:32 +0300 Message-ID: References: <83ees4w562.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="ciao.gmane.io:159.69.161.202"; logging-data="39264"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.7.0 Cc: 40990@debbugs.gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Fri May 01 17:23:29 2020 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1jUXVg-000A5a-Oc for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Fri, 01 May 2020 17:23:28 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:42288 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jUXVf-0007f4-Co for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Fri, 01 May 2020 11:23:27 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:48002) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jUXVR-0007cm-6t for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 01 May 2020 11:23:20 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jUXUI-0006hp-FY for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 01 May 2020 11:23:12 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:38890) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jUXUI-0006hk-16 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 01 May 2020 11:22:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1jUXUH-0002TX-QW for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 01 May 2020 11:22:01 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Dmitry Gutov Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Fri, 01 May 2020 15:22:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 40990 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Original-Received: via spool by 40990-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B40990.15883465029488 (code B ref 40990); Fri, 01 May 2020 15:22:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 40990) by debbugs.gnu.org; 1 May 2020 15:21:42 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:50436 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1jUXTy-0002Sy-G9 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 01 May 2020 11:21:42 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-wm1-f52.google.com ([209.85.128.52]:55576) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1jUXTw-0002Sj-Bo for 40990@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 01 May 2020 11:21:40 -0400 Original-Received: by mail-wm1-f52.google.com with SMTP id e26so33737wmk.5 for <40990@debbugs.gnu.org>; Fri, 01 May 2020 08:21:40 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=sender:subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id:date:user-agent :mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language:content-transfer-encoding; bh=QypKv/OfbYF6tmHZYXKPYrq0CUHj3+p/aWUJ4Lj3+Bs=; b=FDLfLqnxhENO7m/yKZ5W0EpofNIholfU4sX9vsb1FfpZRz/qDF1Fah0nzoSteSqTdS GscHOXICrbxxPcrD4OZFrBOp5FccR35kwRySMPoCouOFhFDuDQp4N5zZxJwYiZJWH8es osUHzf9u/BPqeNnSnaHQLzTd2kfpUNmelcVEibcGpPI3xKL9ldH/fjTc3Mk7ihHHwWyH XUaaWXXLBl+qzorlYoXVRmtfTCc6Xy43A3Q7o66HaaD5eY2mKWCbXWn2CZwKdbOKO4Cx Xg0iy4IbJPdi+UGNRRjrSerkxhttXQtY7OpwUTd4Q3x/uFk94EB5Y/FjkJx0vwjBUltB udQw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:sender:subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id :date:user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language :content-transfer-encoding; bh=QypKv/OfbYF6tmHZYXKPYrq0CUHj3+p/aWUJ4Lj3+Bs=; b=ogy5fRfHfN/8yhIDcEVeFk5TPoLoInw7yLCRq0ZBQRGLbW34yE1DBEgTRw+1mS6mei a+mvUZlnHVR6XCJ5HwEnYikyIZwHMFzBBeqB6shUvyNIZhyRniuFOPP6vPPFq5IF0SVp o0cV6ihTMzH94Mq9aNagKqZZ1f70LB0mRBaeULl7CwDrGnHLXulIlNbhB7VKGJin0YoL goIlWI0WIFB9388sY1tdmsLxB68Zz+SbbXTi7lAxe/v9V4SyHtl+zexjBHCboy/EqSEY x4UA0szmdsfeg1+6obCc57KTl4Tov5WjATsU8BQBf5PhnC+ZsiBZE5HADjSM8EINvKy9 QZAA== X-Gm-Message-State: AGi0PubacGZDRvjU1xFtj4AXvCjzzxBa96tIRXD8quC7v3ruS0anqlVp 2L2AYas41/wmo08RFOJGF1xHqP9zJBw= X-Google-Smtp-Source: APiQypJzGRS5zO1ezE/qldiIa4OT4lKVr5PqQq3pZWHSclvaAlAisMrBSgL4vCQrWEFKd6QputtqJQ== X-Received: by 2002:a1c:4b16:: with SMTP id y22mr74236wma.170.1588346494211; Fri, 01 May 2020 08:21:34 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: from [192.168.0.3] ([66.205.73.129]) by smtp.googlemail.com with ESMTPSA id x18sm4767365wrv.12.2020.05.01.08.21.33 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Fri, 01 May 2020 08:21:33 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <83ees4w562.fsf@gnu.org> Content-Language: en-US X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-Received-From: 209.51.188.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:179434 Archived-At: On 01.05.2020 09:16, Eli Zaretskii wrote: > Thanks, but I see nothing in these arguments to say that it's urgent > or even very important to have these UI changes in Emacs 27. It's steps like this that address the perceived lack of polish that users see when starting to use Emacs. So I'm fairly sure it's important. Just not critical, of course. And my arguments are, as usual, about the added value vs risk. Which I'm fairly sure is minimal. > Please help me release Emacs 27.1 as soon as possible by trying to > look at this stuff from my POV. ...I do? (*) Just with somewhat different approach, e.g. preponderance of evidence rather than presumption of unimportance. :-) Anyway, such discussions should become rare if we somehow manage to speed up the release cycle someday. (*) For instance, I chose the proposed changes critically, leaving out certain others that would add more risk.