From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Lennart Borgman Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs,gmane.emacs.pretest.bugs Subject: bug#3467: 23.0.94; let + make-local-variable => let value made global Date: Sat, 6 Jun 2009 01:08:17 +0200 Message-ID: References: Reply-To: Lennart Borgman , 3467@emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1244243854 2958 80.91.229.12 (5 Jun 2009 23:17:34 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 5 Jun 2009 23:17:34 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-pretest-bug@gnu.org, 3467@emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com To: Stefan Monnier Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Jun 06 01:17:31 2009 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1MCifC-0006bt-LJ for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sat, 06 Jun 2009 01:17:30 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:46573 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1MCifB-0003x6-QG for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Fri, 05 Jun 2009 19:17:29 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1MCif8-0003x0-5L for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 05 Jun 2009 19:17:26 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1MCif3-0003wT-Dl for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 05 Jun 2009 19:17:25 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=58202 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1MCif3-0003wP-8X for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 05 Jun 2009 19:17:21 -0400 Original-Received: from rzlab.ucr.edu ([138.23.92.77]:34788) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1MCif2-0004ua-Mm for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 05 Jun 2009 19:17:21 -0400 Original-Received: from rzlab.ucr.edu (rzlab.ucr.edu [127.0.0.1]) by rzlab.ucr.edu (8.14.3/8.14.3/Debian-5) with ESMTP id n55NHIdO017349; Fri, 5 Jun 2009 16:17:18 -0700 Original-Received: (from debbugs@localhost) by rzlab.ucr.edu (8.14.3/8.14.3/Submit) id n55NF4dT016768; Fri, 5 Jun 2009 16:15:04 -0700 X-Loop: owner@emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com Resent-From: Lennart Borgman Resent-To: bug-submit-list@donarmstrong.com Resent-CC: Emacs Bugs Resent-Date: Fri, 05 Jun 2009 23:15:04 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: owner@emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com X-Emacs-PR-Message: followup 3467 X-Emacs-PR-Package: emacs X-Emacs-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by submit@emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com id=B.124424331116017 (code B ref -1); Fri, 05 Jun 2009 23:15:04 +0000 Original-Received: (at submit) by emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com; 5 Jun 2009 23:08:31 +0000 X-Spam-Bayes: score:0.5 Bayes not run. spammytokens:Tokens not available. hammytokens:Tokens not available. Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org (fencepost.gnu.org [140.186.70.10]) by rzlab.ucr.edu (8.14.3/8.14.3/Debian-5) with ESMTP id n55N8R0J016006 for ; Fri, 5 Jun 2009 16:08:28 -0700 Original-Received: from mail.gnu.org ([199.232.76.166]:47652 helo=mx10.gnu.org) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.67) (envelope-from ) id 1MCiWL-0005Gf-Ky for emacs-pretest-bug@gnu.org; Fri, 05 Jun 2009 19:08:21 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by monty-python.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1MCiWK-0003SD-V0 for emacs-pretest-bug@gnu.org; Fri, 05 Jun 2009 19:08:21 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-bw0-f227.google.com ([209.85.218.227]:38830) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1MCiWK-0003S7-Kc for emacs-pretest-bug@gnu.org; Fri, 05 Jun 2009 19:08:20 -0400 Original-Received: by bwz27 with SMTP id 27so18542bwz.42 for ; Fri, 05 Jun 2009 16:08:19 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=YMyxtgJb8QSg4Aj9OX7dEDC7LUa2BUOw5s919W9kMy8=; b=fihqhAZhhuKxzEiPx/Qb7elUiZm8X91I9FI1MjS9KXffTbNzwQWLA/6ePXvKDH0v2B 9iM3fXPgoTIHy1rtB9G5Cr8IBAwUegY3wwTrD/Xcb61s9TY4FDPus7f8p9oK/kfmweGY ZJCRqKH9rjDR5pn3/QZRLDXl9xL/R2db+SabU= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=l6XTXxDLpMZEYF+a8swWijGkfBcgrVs0oLM1+ErvrDM9TuxFb0q0rFlbPJfD7Qn9Ns 3yJ4h9kibESHBL27Zmqfw8JmTbk+dodUS4eLwJJthAPv1Qoz09ND+v+g4p0EMfGS7KM/ 8P3u8lPirIR8gWY//J/FI2At366Opl44hddVI= Original-Received: by 10.239.156.139 with SMTP id m11mr314553hbc.65.1244243297882; Fri, 05 Jun 2009 16:08:17 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: X-detected-operating-system: by monty-python.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 2) X-CrossAssassin-Score: 2 X-detected-operating-system: by monty-python.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 2) Resent-Date: Fri, 05 Jun 2009 19:17:25 -0400 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:28517 gmane.emacs.pretest.bugs:24572 Archived-At: On Sat, Jun 6, 2009 at 12:48 AM, Lennart Borgman wrote: > > Sigh, and my suggestion was of course unnecessary stupid. What is > needed is of course to record values and frame+buffer localness and > dito values and reset them. Nothing less than this will ever work > correctly, or? > > And does not this apply to all uses of specbind + unbind_to? > > Can it be sufficient to just change specbind and unbind_to? Is there > anything else that will be affected by changes in the specbind stack? > Since info about buffer+frame is alwas needed should specbinding be > changed to the below form? > > struct specbinding > =C2=A0{ > =C2=A0 =C2=A0Lisp_Object symbol; > =C2=A0 =C2=A0Lisp_Object old_value; > =C2=A0 =C2=A0Lisp_Object old_buffer_value; > =C2=A0 =C2=A0Lisp_Object old_frame_value; > =C2=A0 =C2=A0specbinding_func func; > =C2=A0 =C2=A0Lisp_Object unused; =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 /* Dividing = by 16 is faster than by 12 */ > =C2=A0 =C2=A0Lisp_Object unused; > =C2=A0 =C2=A0Lisp_Object unused; > =C2=A0}; > > Is this structure used by other functions than specbind and unbind_to? ... and defvar ... but I do not think there are any more uses of specbinding's structure. Or does some allocation need to change?