From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: "Lennart Borgman" Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#865: 23.0.60; The directory is unsafe today Date: Fri, 5 Sep 2008 12:29:43 +0200 Message-ID: References: <48BD642C.5050405@gmail.com> <48BF2171.8040101@gnu.org> Reply-To: Lennart Borgman , 865@emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1220611692 28304 80.91.229.12 (5 Sep 2008 10:48:12 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 5 Sep 2008 10:48:12 +0000 (UTC) Cc: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org, Francis Litterio To: "Eli Zaretskii" , 865@emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Sep 05 12:49:06 2008 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1KbYsC-0001V1-F9 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Fri, 05 Sep 2008 12:49:04 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:35564 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1KbYrC-0002UE-V3 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Fri, 05 Sep 2008 06:48:03 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1KbYqo-0001wl-S8 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 05 Sep 2008 06:47:38 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1KbYqm-0001qq-2g for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 05 Sep 2008 06:47:36 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=34120 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1KbYql-0001qH-FX for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 05 Sep 2008 06:47:35 -0400 Original-Received: from rzlab.ucr.edu ([138.23.92.77]:57453) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1KbYqk-0001l7-T8 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 05 Sep 2008 06:47:35 -0400 Original-Received: from rzlab.ucr.edu (rzlab.ucr.edu [127.0.0.1]) by rzlab.ucr.edu (8.13.8/8.13.8/Debian-3) with ESMTP id m85AlVqu017891; Fri, 5 Sep 2008 03:47:32 -0700 Original-Received: (from debbugs@localhost) by rzlab.ucr.edu (8.13.8/8.13.8/Submit) id m85Ae439014949; Fri, 5 Sep 2008 03:40:04 -0700 X-Loop: don@donarmstrong.com Resent-From: "Lennart Borgman" Resent-To: bug-submit-list@donarmstrong.com Resent-CC: Emacs Bugs Resent-Date: Fri, 05 Sep 2008 10:40:04 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: don@donarmstrong.com X-Emacs-PR-Message: report 865 X-Emacs-PR-Package: emacs X-Emacs-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by submit@emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com id=B.122061067912794 (code B ref -1); Fri, 05 Sep 2008 10:40:04 +0000 Original-Received: (at submit) by emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com; 5 Sep 2008 10:31:19 +0000 Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [199.232.76.165]) by rzlab.ucr.edu (8.13.8/8.13.8/Debian-3) with ESMTP id m85AVFeO012788 for ; Fri, 5 Sep 2008 03:31:16 -0700 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1KbYaw-0005fl-Ad for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 05 Sep 2008 06:31:14 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1KbYas-0005bg-17 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 05 Sep 2008 06:31:10 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=43327 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1KbYan-0005Ya-9I for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 05 Sep 2008 06:31:06 -0400 Original-Received: from fg-out-1718.google.com ([72.14.220.155]:2048) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1KbYal-0006ly-Ii for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 05 Sep 2008 06:31:03 -0400 Original-Received: by fg-out-1718.google.com with SMTP id l26so727359fgb.30 for ; Fri, 05 Sep 2008 03:29:44 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to :subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; bh=4Zb9xRGcuJIPs9UP9oWPXO0LNUktZi+QwNTYsW5frSI=; b=jFhmLYRpBA+3Qkyh6Fyi1S3NuhMCXK5pu2sWtN4q92oQoYSFin5hBa7f6Q77O70x4B bNDRir7QRKGThkn4PmNjIKINj9rLlnaeYx5PqsNGFLAwhfKAQt3xaep6+PKZd//MzQs4 xpxAiQfDQt0V0HcV0grs288KGJQwKt6UndFgo= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition :references; b=nh6L+Wqql9qZtTUzWKExngE7mDMChEEeoVjbrWPW66grchier26/FWIvtw8shogtVl WrZgqoBM/77+AJDk9wGBi7iUkPnbfCZtgg44MM7vwwIcIzTrjFMRLTu9o2KRcctI4HUM lFwmjnUqD2EDOEVWZLiORhytxnYnScQdfEb3w= Original-Received: by 10.86.96.18 with SMTP id t18mr8658632fgb.1.1220610584077; Fri, 05 Sep 2008 03:29:44 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: by 10.86.65.3 with HTTP; Fri, 5 Sep 2008 03:29:43 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: Content-Disposition: inline X-detected-kernel: by monty-python.gnu.org: Linux 2.6 (newer, 2) X-CrossAssassin-Score: 2 X-detected-kernel: by monty-python.gnu.org: Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) Resent-Date: Fri, 05 Sep 2008 06:47:36 -0400 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:20192 Archived-At: On 9/5/08, Eli Zaretskii wrote: > > From: Francis Litterio > > Date: Thu, 04 Sep 2008 14:08:36 -0400 > > Cc: > > > > But if Windows says the file is owned by the Local Administrators group, > > hasn't the information about which user created it been lost? The file > > is not truly owned by any single user. > > > > Thus, (nth 2 (file-attributes ...)) can never return a meaningful > > existing user ID for a file that is owned by a group. > > Well, that's the problem we are trying to solve... I think Stefan is suggesting what I suggested before: Change the owner. But that does not necessarily help since it is the ACL lists that tells who has access to the directory, not the owner. Some comments on what is going on there so we can move forward to a reasonable suggestion?