From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Glenn Morris Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#20011: etc/PROBLEMS: updates, wording, typos Date: Fri, 06 Mar 2015 11:58:38 -0500 Message-ID: References: <871tl315el.fsf@violet.siamics.net> <83ioeeo6rc.fsf@gnu.org> <87sidize1t.fsf@violet.siamics.net> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1425661231 19205 80.91.229.3 (6 Mar 2015 17:00:31 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 6 Mar 2015 17:00:31 +0000 (UTC) To: 20011@debbugs.gnu.org Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Mar 06 18:00:20 2015 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1YTvbl-0004Kd-31 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Fri, 06 Mar 2015 18:00:17 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:59225 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YTvbk-0004uM-Mh for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Fri, 06 Mar 2015 12:00:16 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:55996) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YTvaf-0003bM-Ld for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 06 Mar 2015 11:59:15 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YTvaY-0003Bm-70 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 06 Mar 2015 11:59:09 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:39155) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YTvaY-0003Bb-4W for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 06 Mar 2015 11:59:02 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1YTvaX-0002pU-SN for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 06 Mar 2015 11:59:01 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Glenn Morris Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Fri, 06 Mar 2015 16:59:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 20011 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: patch Original-Received: via spool by 20011-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B20011.142566112310845 (code B ref 20011); Fri, 06 Mar 2015 16:59:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 20011) by debbugs.gnu.org; 6 Mar 2015 16:58:43 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:37723 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1YTvaE-0002or-O4 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 06 Mar 2015 11:58:42 -0500 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([208.118.235.10]:53801 ident=Debian-exim) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1YTvaC-0002oi-H7 for 20011@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 06 Mar 2015 11:58:40 -0500 Original-Received: from rgm by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YTvaA-0005ik-KP; Fri, 06 Mar 2015 11:58:38 -0500 X-Spook: Peking codes Yukon BATF top secret Tony Blair radar X-Ran: R5('qRe8#x6@:[fe\f;B;C^b4v'jDH;F*[yQr7P4V.B}?qUQD$+SIOd]mxct?\~S;a-B"P X-Hue: red X-Attribution: GM In-Reply-To: <87sidize1t.fsf@violet.siamics.net> (Ivan Shmakov's message of "Fri, 06 Mar 2015 09:10:54 +0000") User-Agent: Gnus (www.gnus.org), GNU Emacs (www.gnu.org/software/emacs/) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 3.x X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:100173 Archived-At: Ivan Shmakov wrote: > AIUI, there's nothing wrong with using "which" there, either. I disagree. Eg http://blog.apastyle.org/apastyle/2012/01/that-versus-which.html