Re: Bug in clone-indirect-buffer and clone-indirect-buffer-other-window

[Kevin Rodgers <ihs_4664@yahoo.com>]

Jay Bingham wrote:
 > Personally, I would prefer to have some way to differentiate between
 > buffers which contain different files with the same name and buffers
 > that actually point to the same file without having to enter a name
 > for the clone.  I also prefer the numeric indicator to follow the
 > existing buffer name.  Realizing the the same function is likely used
 > to generate the file names I am still willing to suggest that perhaps
 > the `[N]' or `{N}' designators could be used to indicate a cloned
 > buffer as opposed to an automatically generated file name.

Perhaps you can use (require 'uniquify) to help get what you want -- see
the uniquify-buffer-name-style and uniquify-ask-about-buffer-names-p
options.

-- 
Kevin Rodgers