From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Glenn Morris Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#14781: coding system changes cause make check to hang in icalendar tests Date: Mon, 08 Jul 2013 12:52:29 -0400 Message-ID: References: <87y59hp84d.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1373302389 29234 80.91.229.3 (8 Jul 2013 16:53:09 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 8 Jul 2013 16:53:09 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 14781@debbugs.gnu.org To: Kenichi Handa Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Jul 08 18:53:07 2013 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1UwEgV-0000Zc-MF for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Mon, 08 Jul 2013 18:53:07 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:37590 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UwEgV-0002jZ-C1 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Mon, 08 Jul 2013 12:53:07 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:52423) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UwEgR-0002j2-Du for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 08 Jul 2013 12:53:04 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UwEgQ-0008No-5K for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 08 Jul 2013 12:53:03 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:45461) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UwEgQ-0008Nk-0S for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 08 Jul 2013 12:53:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1UwEgP-000164-Lg for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 08 Jul 2013 12:53:01 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org In-Reply-To: <6zju35ux8.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> Resent-From: Glenn Morris Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Mon, 08 Jul 2013 16:53:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 14781 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 14781-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B14781.13733023524139 (code B ref 14781); Mon, 08 Jul 2013 16:53:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 14781) by debbugs.gnu.org; 8 Jul 2013 16:52:32 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:39771 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1UwEfw-00014g-Dd for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 08 Jul 2013 12:52:32 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([208.118.235.10]:54999 ident=Debian-exim) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1UwEfu-00014Y-B9 for 14781@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 08 Jul 2013 12:52:30 -0400 Original-Received: from rgm by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UwEft-0004HO-JP; Mon, 08 Jul 2013 12:52:29 -0400 X-Spook: UNSCOM hackers CID Bletchley Park Tony Blair FIPS140 X-Ran: uS>D#|CYZ9=E9c+1[/ List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:76074 Archived-At: Kenichi Handa wrote: > I've just committed a fix to the trunk. Thanks. > Actually, the culprit was test/automated/decoder-tests.el which > changes priorities of coding systems. I didn't know that all tests > under test/automated are executed in a single Emacs session, and thus > they must be side-effect free. I think they should all be side-effect free (as much as possible) anyway. Someone might well want to run an individual test in an existing Emacs session, without that session getting messed up. > Isn't it better to execute each test file in its own Emacs session? I don't know. Running them all in one is the only way to get the final number of tests run / passed / failed to be accurate. Running them in separate Emacs's would allow them to run in parallel, which would be faster, but might be confusing?